Post by crystalriver on Nov 1, 2009 14:12:28 GMT -5
Human Extinction --The Genetic Genocide--A Call for The Survival of the Pure--Human Race
Posted By: CrystalRiver <Send E-Mail>
Date: Sunday, 1-Nov-2009 14:05:12 Dear RM Agents and Readers,
This article raises several questions in my mind--first to suggest that it is inevitable seems to be a defeatist thought from the get go. Often if an issue is looked at by many folks --someone will surely come up with a different thought--even though those that would place controls on us would like us to see only a couple routes be assured there is always another way.
The other comment in this article that I found interesting was comparing man to chimpanzee. I wonder if the same can be said of the genetics of those with Rh negative blood or does it matter?
If the question lies in maintaining the original DNA--who would that be? I found as many questions as I did answers in this article. I suppose that means it's a good article--it made me think.
My research into Morgellons and the discoverey of an Rh negative connection is begining to point to a certain mtDNA type. Could the morgies be the originals? Could it be they were never meant to be wired from the get go? Do you find it interesting that Wiki has cast the Morgies as "crazy" from the get go? Does it not make you wonder what their true intention is? Sounds like they are cheering the death of man or perhaps I've misunderstood the intent.
As this article gives one more questions than answers--so does the information that I have presented here.
Many Blessings,
CrystalRiver
---------------------------------------------------------
Human Extinction the Genetic Genocide a Call for the Survival of
the Pure-Human Race
After a recent look at the wikipedia entry for the term human extinction I noticed all the lovely ways such an act can come about, what I found particularly interesting is the addition of transhumansim as a possible route towards human extinction in the evolution section. Here is the excerpt form the wikipedia entry "Human Extinction" Evolution Evolution of humanity into a posthuman life-form or existence by means of technology, leaving no trace of original humans. The chances of a genetic change of humanity to replace its ancestral predecessor is low, but possible in millions of years from now.
Commentators such as Hans Moravec argue that humanity will eventually be supplanted and replaced by artificial intelligence or other forms of artificial life; others such as Kevin Warwick point to the possibility of humans evolving by linking with technology[1]; while others have argued that humanity will inevitably experience a technological singularity, and furthermore that this outcome is desirable (seesingularitarianism).
Transhumanist genetic engineering could lead to a species unable to inter-procreate, accidentally resulting in actual (rather than pseudo) extinction.
Isaac Asimov's The Last Question, Greg Bear's Blood Music, and Arthur C. Clarke's Childhood's End provide diversions on this theme.
Evolution of humanity into another hominid species. Humans will continue to evolve via traditional natural selection over a period of millions of years, and homo sapiens will gradually transition into one or more new species. This mechanism for the extinction of Homo sapiens would, however, require that regional interbreeding ceases for tens of thousands of years.
Dysgenics among humanity resulting in a less intelligent species. (See Idiocracy.)
Evolution of another species that out-competes humans for food, habitat or hunts as prey.
As you can see transhumanism has now made it's way to wikipedia, yet none of this is new. We all know the possible dangerous associated with human enhancement, and other technologies. Only everyone seems to tip toe around this overly huge clause in the "road to utopia".. Seriously the entire thing sounds insidious simply listen to it. Come my child I'm going to take you to paradise, oh and by the way you may not survive the journey.
Lets quantify the last statement a little more, when we say "you may not survive the journey" what we really meant is your entire species may not survive the journey,
not just you. Sorry for the confusion.
The truth of the matter is that this is far easier to being a reality than most people really give credit to. Lets take our closes animal relative's DNA.
Research by Mary-Claire King in 1973 found 99% identical DNA between human beings and chimpanzees
If we share 99% our Dna with a chimp I dare ask you a simple question, how much of our dna can we change before the resulting genetically altered being is considered another species from humans?
More at this link: www.transalchemy.com/articles/human-extinction-the-genetic-genocide-a-call-for-the-survival-of-the-pure-human-race
Discovered at: www.redicecreations.com/
Posted By: CrystalRiver <Send E-Mail>
Date: Sunday, 1-Nov-2009 14:05:12 Dear RM Agents and Readers,
This article raises several questions in my mind--first to suggest that it is inevitable seems to be a defeatist thought from the get go. Often if an issue is looked at by many folks --someone will surely come up with a different thought--even though those that would place controls on us would like us to see only a couple routes be assured there is always another way.
The other comment in this article that I found interesting was comparing man to chimpanzee. I wonder if the same can be said of the genetics of those with Rh negative blood or does it matter?
If the question lies in maintaining the original DNA--who would that be? I found as many questions as I did answers in this article. I suppose that means it's a good article--it made me think.
My research into Morgellons and the discoverey of an Rh negative connection is begining to point to a certain mtDNA type. Could the morgies be the originals? Could it be they were never meant to be wired from the get go? Do you find it interesting that Wiki has cast the Morgies as "crazy" from the get go? Does it not make you wonder what their true intention is? Sounds like they are cheering the death of man or perhaps I've misunderstood the intent.
As this article gives one more questions than answers--so does the information that I have presented here.
Many Blessings,
CrystalRiver
---------------------------------------------------------
Human Extinction the Genetic Genocide a Call for the Survival of
the Pure-Human Race
After a recent look at the wikipedia entry for the term human extinction I noticed all the lovely ways such an act can come about, what I found particularly interesting is the addition of transhumansim as a possible route towards human extinction in the evolution section. Here is the excerpt form the wikipedia entry "Human Extinction" Evolution Evolution of humanity into a posthuman life-form or existence by means of technology, leaving no trace of original humans. The chances of a genetic change of humanity to replace its ancestral predecessor is low, but possible in millions of years from now.
Commentators such as Hans Moravec argue that humanity will eventually be supplanted and replaced by artificial intelligence or other forms of artificial life; others such as Kevin Warwick point to the possibility of humans evolving by linking with technology[1]; while others have argued that humanity will inevitably experience a technological singularity, and furthermore that this outcome is desirable (seesingularitarianism).
Transhumanist genetic engineering could lead to a species unable to inter-procreate, accidentally resulting in actual (rather than pseudo) extinction.
Isaac Asimov's The Last Question, Greg Bear's Blood Music, and Arthur C. Clarke's Childhood's End provide diversions on this theme.
Evolution of humanity into another hominid species. Humans will continue to evolve via traditional natural selection over a period of millions of years, and homo sapiens will gradually transition into one or more new species. This mechanism for the extinction of Homo sapiens would, however, require that regional interbreeding ceases for tens of thousands of years.
Dysgenics among humanity resulting in a less intelligent species. (See Idiocracy.)
Evolution of another species that out-competes humans for food, habitat or hunts as prey.
As you can see transhumanism has now made it's way to wikipedia, yet none of this is new. We all know the possible dangerous associated with human enhancement, and other technologies. Only everyone seems to tip toe around this overly huge clause in the "road to utopia".. Seriously the entire thing sounds insidious simply listen to it. Come my child I'm going to take you to paradise, oh and by the way you may not survive the journey.
Lets quantify the last statement a little more, when we say "you may not survive the journey" what we really meant is your entire species may not survive the journey,
not just you. Sorry for the confusion.
The truth of the matter is that this is far easier to being a reality than most people really give credit to. Lets take our closes animal relative's DNA.
Research by Mary-Claire King in 1973 found 99% identical DNA between human beings and chimpanzees
If we share 99% our Dna with a chimp I dare ask you a simple question, how much of our dna can we change before the resulting genetically altered being is considered another species from humans?
More at this link: www.transalchemy.com/articles/human-extinction-the-genetic-genocide-a-call-for-the-survival-of-the-pure-human-race
Discovered at: www.redicecreations.com/