|
Post by whiterose on Feb 27, 2007 21:14:15 GMT -5
Below is posted a link where you can go and ask for the stories you wish to be heard, if we all do it, someone will listen. Remember we need to let them know about the DNA being destroyed and replaced with a blank page, also make sure they understand that it is not just dermatological. It is in animals and plants and people, and folks should realize that it is so wide spread that it needs to be addressed. Many may be carriers and not even know it. There are most likely different kinds, some worse than others. Good Luck! www.care2.com/news/whiterose
|
|
|
Post by madmusician on Feb 28, 2007 16:46:42 GMT -5
The Agrobactreium series looks like a possible candidate for vectoring Morgellons. It (a. tumefaciens) has been used to conjugate plasmids into plants as a pesticide, such as cotton, for targeting Lepidoptera. Argo has been demonstrated (as far back as 1999) to be able to enter the human genome. It most likely infects other plants and insects/animals on its vectoring route. This could explain the manifestations seen with human sufferers (insect-like "live" secretions and fibers, i.e. gene expression changes as DNA from contact organisms/plants is conjugated and assimilated). In addition, it kills insects by crystals (from inserted plasmids -- T-DNA) absorbed into the insects gut, but, it has also been observed to enter the insects bloodstream -- this could be a serious vectoring method for this beast. (I can expand on this if interested, or send articles on this topic.)
Argo, by the way, has been used in crops since 1967...
|
|
|
Post by madmusician on Feb 28, 2007 16:55:29 GMT -5
correction "Agro"
I am also curious if there is anyone who has had symtoms before 1967. This could be possible because a. tumefaciens is found naturally in the soil -- it's been exploited and sprayed over wide areas. So, that explains the rise in the number of infected people in the last 30 years -- also the internet has made communication of Morgellons widely available.
|
|
|
Post by whiterose on Feb 28, 2007 17:11:18 GMT -5
So would this agrobacterium eat the DNA, I believe the mycoplasma is involved, I believe the agrobacterium is involved, perhaps in nano state. I also know that we have self replicating machines that are involved. I have seen them and lived with them for over 25 years. I do know nanotechnology is a part of this scenario.
I realize there are thousands of different new products hitting the market, with this technology, that is why I keep red flagging nanotechnology.
|
|
|
Post by whiterose on Feb 28, 2007 17:23:30 GMT -5
Read my new post in Nanotechnology, This is their Weapon Folks, Department of Defense, ring any bells.
They will do anything to keep there weapon, including killing half the population!
whiterose
|
|
|
Post by whiterose on Feb 28, 2007 17:36:56 GMT -5
This thread was originally started to post the information of this site to ask that it be spoke of in articles, someone new posted over it. I hope all will see this and reply, it takes us all, please help. www.care2.com/news/
|
|
|
Post by madmusician on Mar 1, 2007 10:30:25 GMT -5
This article illustrates how a. tumefaciens, in concert with E. Coli plasmids and other bizzare plasmids, is incorporated/conjugated into the cotton genome for an incecticide targeting Lepidoptera. Pretty wild stuff... www.bch.biodic.go.jp/download/en_lmo/757enRi.pdf
|
|
|
Post by madmusician on Mar 1, 2007 10:38:03 GMT -5
Above article see page (4) in particular concerning a. tumefaciens., however, it's all quite facinating and scary. This superbug isn't so silent...
|
|
|
Post by madmusician on Mar 1, 2007 10:45:46 GMT -5
Nanotechnology I don't believe is a component. However, nature uses it's own nanotechnology -- then mutation. Just think of a bactreium that can swap its T-DNA , Ti-Plasmids, etc., with ALL biological kingdoms. The vector becomes more complex as it moves.
|
|
|
Post by whiterose on Mar 1, 2007 12:47:06 GMT -5
Let's speculate that you are correct, about nano not being involved except by pure chance of nature, kind of like the contrails versus chemtrails, (that is what you are saying) then I find it so peculiar that the pictures of Dave Larson's so emulate the Department of Defense Weapon. Interesting how nature works isn't it and this space was made to get names for a petition. I realize your new and perhaps that is your confusion, but I would appreciate if you would put your comments in the correct categories. Much appreciated.
|
|
|
Post by madmusician on Mar 1, 2007 13:01:45 GMT -5
My mother has this -- and what I'm finding is that people like you are inflexible and arrogant. You don't like new members and are harsh on them, so, you know what -- I'm done contibuting to sites like these. You are so caught up in the conspiracy theory end of things that you refuse to hear any other possibilies. I think you are the one confused and intolerant. I'm certainly not a big fan about the way the CDC, FDA and EPA operates, believe me. Please ban me because I don't want to be tempted into making anymore comments that are from empirical observations (look at Dr. Citovsky's findings on people with Morgellons symptoms having agrobacterium present in their lesions that SHOULD NOT be there -- I've been in contact with him).
Good luck to you! I hope you get to the bottom of this...
|
|
|
Post by whiterose on Mar 1, 2007 13:25:40 GMT -5
I believe the agrobacterium is involved, I believe the mycoplasma is involved and I also believe nano technology is involved.
Many folks have the desire to point to just one thing, just one cause, just one right, but in many of my previous posts you will ready why this in itself leads to confusion. There are several things playing out here.
I am sorry for your mom, please give her my regards, it is a very tough road. It is for these people like your mom that I wish to make the petition easily accessible. It can be difficult enough, without someone placing more road blocks. Please be kind to your mom, she has suffered enough.
I can see how you misunderstood the first post in this thread, if you would have read it fully, you would see that I was pointing to news at another web address. Not here.
|
|
|
Post by whiterose on Mar 1, 2007 13:49:16 GMT -5
|
|