Post by alankey on Nov 30, 2008 17:30:41 GMT -5
it is little known that sources of illumination actually produce electromagnetic waves beyod that which we would normally expect,ie outside the optical frequency.
for one flourescent light bulbs produce radiowaves,the adverse effects of flourescent lights have long been noted,yet nothing has ever been done to combat that,infact there even being phased in across the western would.
here are some examples of the health effects of the radiowaves emitted by flourescent light bulbs
www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?pageId=57598
"About a month ago while shopping at the grocery store, my 2-year-old daughter had a strange neurological reaction as she stood near the freezers in the frozen food section in front of the glass-encased doors. She was staring at the floor with her little arms up a bit and whimpering about falling down. I thought she must have spun around and I didn't notice, so I told her that she would be fine and to come over to me. She was standing just a few feet away in front of the cart on the other side of me. She wouldn't come after I repeatedly tried to reassure her, so I walked over to her to see what she was staring at on the floor, because she was saying that she was about to fall down because the floor was moving.
I stood next to her and looked down and for half a second I felt woozy, and it looked like the blue painted patterns on the floor were moving! It freaked me out. I got real still and listened and all I could hear was the loud humming of the freezers and thought maybe the electro-magnetic field must be strong in that area. I then looked up to see what could possibly make the floor appear to be moving, and all I could see was a light blue haze around the fluorescent lights overhead. I couldn't even make out the ceiling because of the haze. I later figured that the UV rays from the fluorescent lights inside the freezer and the UV rays from the fluorescent lights overhead weren't meshing right frequency-wise, or maybe one or the other or both were malfunctioning.
I picked her up and we headed to the cash register. I noticed that there weren't any painted patterns on the floor near the register, so I put her down when it was time to pay and told her to stand next to her brothers. They were in front of the bagging area next to the cart. She stood for a few seconds and started crying again: "Bout to fall down, bout to fall down!" – so I told my 9-year-old son to pick her up. He kept asking me what was wrong with her, and I whispered to him that she was dizzy and just to hold her till I finished paying. After I paid for our groceries, I grabbed my daughter, and we quickly left the store.
The whole experience was so weird. After I came home, I scroogled, "fluorescent lights dizziness big box stores," and was amazed at what I discovered. Apparently, there are many people who cannot tolerate these type of lights. Special tinted sunglasses, wide-brimmed hats and clothing to cover every area of skin is recommended for people who become sick due to fluro lighting. I learned that many people are affected by fluorescent lighting just like my daughter was that evening, and I briefly was, with acute vertigo and disorientation.
Many people also suffer with panic-anxiety attacks, nausea, extreme fatigue, brain fog,and general ill feelings after being exposed to fluorescent lighting. I recently learned of studies proving how school children perform poorer and have more behavioral problems in classrooms lit by fluorescent light and no natural sunlight and that the rate of depression, suicide and cancer go up when people are exposed to constant fluorescents.
I learned about tens of thousands of premature babies in the U.S. and throughout the world blinded by retinal detachment after being exposed to constant fluorescent lighting in hospital nurseries when that type of lighting was first introduced and mass marketed in hospitals worldwide.
I learned that fluro lighting has been implicated in the epidemic of adult-onset blindness caused by macular degeneration as the first generation of people growing up under fluorescent lighting matures.
I learned that 24-hours of exposure to fluorescent lights produces chromosomal damage to otherwise healthy cells.
I have also learned that some businesses are beginning to understand the health hazards associated with fluorescent lighting and are restructuring ceiling angles and heights and painting their ceilings black to help absorb the harmful rays emitted by fluorescent lights.
I had read in the past that fluorescent lighting triggers migraine headaches for those who suffer from migraines, triggers seizures in epileptics and causes rashes for people with certain skin disorders, but I never looked into it further because, honestly, I thought it sounded odd and a bit out there. Plus no one in my family suffers from any of those ailments, so I never thought much of it, especially considering how much CFLs are being promoted, energy-conservation wise, and how regular incandescent bulbs are now portrayed as an environmental no-no. I thought surely our government would not ban a good light source and order its citizens to use harmful light sources instead in the near future to help "save the planet"!"
Mrs. Porterfield
nyc.indymedia.org/en/2007/01/81805.html
"http://www.recoveredscience.com/ROPnew_york_times.htm
Premature babies are losing their sight
In ancient times, a particularly brutal torture used for criminals and enemies was to make them stare at the sun until the blazing light destroyed their eyes.
Nowadays, in a more civilized era, even the worst culprits are safe from such cruel and unusual punishment. Yet our most innocent and helpless fellow humans -- premature babies -- enjoy no such protection.
Many are routinely blinded for life from reckless exposure to excess light in the intensive care nurseries where they must spend their first days, weeks, or even months. Indeed, many hundreds of preemies go blind each year, and thousands more wind up with lifelong severe visual handicaps as a result of nursery lighting.
My 4-year-old son David was blinded by what is called retinopathy of prematurity. I wanted to know why and what I learned made me angry. The epidemic of blinding could easily have been ended long before David and thousands of other now blind children were born, if doctors had applied the medical research described in their own journals.
When I tried to bring this to the attention of various physicians and asked them to help eradicate retinopathy of prematurity, I found mostly medical ignorance and indifference.
To anyone able and willing to plow through the clinical papers on this subject, there can be no doubt that the blinding is caused by light. The fluorescent lamps in the nurseries emit high-energy blue wavelengths in a laser-like concentration even more intense than that from the sun.
Research shows that these wavelengths cause the most damage to the retina of the mammals studied, including higher primates. Under an electron microscope, the damage to the animal retinal cells looks very similar lo the cellular damage from retinopathy of prematurity.
The American Academy of Pediatrics specifies that intensive care nurseries should be illuminated with fluorescent light at a light level of 60 foot-candles -- despile a study that demonstrated that 60 foot-candles increased the risk of retinopathy of prematurity.
Neonatologists say the intensive care nurseries are trying to recreate the environment of the womb, but somehow they forget that wombs don't come with lamps. Instead of developing in darkness as nature intended, a preemie's retinas receive, in less than three hours, more than 11 times the amount of irradiation recognized as the industrial danger limit for adult workers.
To make matters worse, the weak and immature preemies are not yet as resistant to light damage as the adults whom the guidelines protect.
In 1986, I wrote to the American Academy of Pediatrics and asked it to change its specifications on nursery lighting to less dangerous levels. It sent me a brush-off reply with the ritual affirmation that more research was needed.
It never replied to any of my follow-up letters. I wrote to many neonatologists and ophthalmologists but received either no reply or platitudes. Not one of the several dozen I wrote to challenged any of the material I had assembled, and not one lifted a finger to help preemies keep their eyesight.
I alerted the New York State Department of Health in 1987 about the mountain of evidence incriminating nursery lights. The people there promised to review the situation and then promptly lost my papers; after a year of my pleading for the babies and writing follow-up letters, they formed a technical advisory group to study the matter. This group is still "studying the matter" and the Department has not done anything to end the blinding.
Few laymen can successfully testify against a physician in medical matters, regardless of how ignorant and indifferent the physician may be. And physicians protect each other with a conspiracy of silence about their wrongdoings.
As long as these attitudes -- and this stubborness -- persist in the medical community, the epidemic of blinding will continue, and many preemies still to be born will have their eyes destroyed by a merciless torture we would no longer inflict on our worst enemies."
i like the it where once again when "our" medical community is approached about something which is covertly damaging our health,they just ignore it,i wonder why.
www.retinopathyofprematurity.org/maculardegeneration01.htm
www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=392434
nyc.indymedia.org/en/2007/01/81805.html
thus it can be seen that EM emitted from sources of illumination causes severe adverse health effects,just googling,lights and dizzyness on google leaves you with endless acounts of people whoes health is being sabotauged by the EM emitted from sources of illumination,everywhere people are complaining of it with symtoms from brain fog to suicidal thoughts,yet sources of luminscent negative EM are increasing at an alarming rate,as if the health warning are being completly ignored.i wonder why that is.
whats more people who are complaining of the health effects as with morgellons are treated as mentaly ill by the medical profession despite the fact thier adverse health effects have been proven by rationale and science!.
folks are being classified as bipolar and manic depressives and are being pescribed anti depressants and such for the effects of luminscent rogue EM!
if this does not ring your alarm bells i dont know what will,its clear the medical profession for some reason appear to be covering up certain irregualrities in our society,usually irregularities that damage our health such as morgellons,mond control and rogue EM.
heres some examples of peoples suffering,
www.thelupussite.com/forum/showthread.php?p=520617
i like lolalola who complains of memory blanks lasting up to two hours,this memory blank or missing time is when your being mind controled,its happening everywhere but once again its being ignored and being passed of as some bizzare medical excuse.
www.power-surge.com/php/forums/lofiversion/index.php/t4252.html
www.steadyhealth.com/i_m_constantly_dizzy_t173138.html
notice most of them refer to "light sensitivity" and being perscribed bi polar medication for thier ailments!!!!,what is going on!?,what has bi polarity got to so with rogue EM from light sources!?!?.
for one flourescent light bulbs produce radiowaves,the adverse effects of flourescent lights have long been noted,yet nothing has ever been done to combat that,infact there even being phased in across the western would.
here are some examples of the health effects of the radiowaves emitted by flourescent light bulbs
www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?pageId=57598
"About a month ago while shopping at the grocery store, my 2-year-old daughter had a strange neurological reaction as she stood near the freezers in the frozen food section in front of the glass-encased doors. She was staring at the floor with her little arms up a bit and whimpering about falling down. I thought she must have spun around and I didn't notice, so I told her that she would be fine and to come over to me. She was standing just a few feet away in front of the cart on the other side of me. She wouldn't come after I repeatedly tried to reassure her, so I walked over to her to see what she was staring at on the floor, because she was saying that she was about to fall down because the floor was moving.
I stood next to her and looked down and for half a second I felt woozy, and it looked like the blue painted patterns on the floor were moving! It freaked me out. I got real still and listened and all I could hear was the loud humming of the freezers and thought maybe the electro-magnetic field must be strong in that area. I then looked up to see what could possibly make the floor appear to be moving, and all I could see was a light blue haze around the fluorescent lights overhead. I couldn't even make out the ceiling because of the haze. I later figured that the UV rays from the fluorescent lights inside the freezer and the UV rays from the fluorescent lights overhead weren't meshing right frequency-wise, or maybe one or the other or both were malfunctioning.
I picked her up and we headed to the cash register. I noticed that there weren't any painted patterns on the floor near the register, so I put her down when it was time to pay and told her to stand next to her brothers. They were in front of the bagging area next to the cart. She stood for a few seconds and started crying again: "Bout to fall down, bout to fall down!" – so I told my 9-year-old son to pick her up. He kept asking me what was wrong with her, and I whispered to him that she was dizzy and just to hold her till I finished paying. After I paid for our groceries, I grabbed my daughter, and we quickly left the store.
The whole experience was so weird. After I came home, I scroogled, "fluorescent lights dizziness big box stores," and was amazed at what I discovered. Apparently, there are many people who cannot tolerate these type of lights. Special tinted sunglasses, wide-brimmed hats and clothing to cover every area of skin is recommended for people who become sick due to fluro lighting. I learned that many people are affected by fluorescent lighting just like my daughter was that evening, and I briefly was, with acute vertigo and disorientation.
Many people also suffer with panic-anxiety attacks, nausea, extreme fatigue, brain fog,and general ill feelings after being exposed to fluorescent lighting. I recently learned of studies proving how school children perform poorer and have more behavioral problems in classrooms lit by fluorescent light and no natural sunlight and that the rate of depression, suicide and cancer go up when people are exposed to constant fluorescents.
I learned about tens of thousands of premature babies in the U.S. and throughout the world blinded by retinal detachment after being exposed to constant fluorescent lighting in hospital nurseries when that type of lighting was first introduced and mass marketed in hospitals worldwide.
I learned that fluro lighting has been implicated in the epidemic of adult-onset blindness caused by macular degeneration as the first generation of people growing up under fluorescent lighting matures.
I learned that 24-hours of exposure to fluorescent lights produces chromosomal damage to otherwise healthy cells.
I have also learned that some businesses are beginning to understand the health hazards associated with fluorescent lighting and are restructuring ceiling angles and heights and painting their ceilings black to help absorb the harmful rays emitted by fluorescent lights.
I had read in the past that fluorescent lighting triggers migraine headaches for those who suffer from migraines, triggers seizures in epileptics and causes rashes for people with certain skin disorders, but I never looked into it further because, honestly, I thought it sounded odd and a bit out there. Plus no one in my family suffers from any of those ailments, so I never thought much of it, especially considering how much CFLs are being promoted, energy-conservation wise, and how regular incandescent bulbs are now portrayed as an environmental no-no. I thought surely our government would not ban a good light source and order its citizens to use harmful light sources instead in the near future to help "save the planet"!"
Mrs. Porterfield
nyc.indymedia.org/en/2007/01/81805.html
"http://www.recoveredscience.com/ROPnew_york_times.htm
Premature babies are losing their sight
In ancient times, a particularly brutal torture used for criminals and enemies was to make them stare at the sun until the blazing light destroyed their eyes.
Nowadays, in a more civilized era, even the worst culprits are safe from such cruel and unusual punishment. Yet our most innocent and helpless fellow humans -- premature babies -- enjoy no such protection.
Many are routinely blinded for life from reckless exposure to excess light in the intensive care nurseries where they must spend their first days, weeks, or even months. Indeed, many hundreds of preemies go blind each year, and thousands more wind up with lifelong severe visual handicaps as a result of nursery lighting.
My 4-year-old son David was blinded by what is called retinopathy of prematurity. I wanted to know why and what I learned made me angry. The epidemic of blinding could easily have been ended long before David and thousands of other now blind children were born, if doctors had applied the medical research described in their own journals.
When I tried to bring this to the attention of various physicians and asked them to help eradicate retinopathy of prematurity, I found mostly medical ignorance and indifference.
To anyone able and willing to plow through the clinical papers on this subject, there can be no doubt that the blinding is caused by light. The fluorescent lamps in the nurseries emit high-energy blue wavelengths in a laser-like concentration even more intense than that from the sun.
Research shows that these wavelengths cause the most damage to the retina of the mammals studied, including higher primates. Under an electron microscope, the damage to the animal retinal cells looks very similar lo the cellular damage from retinopathy of prematurity.
The American Academy of Pediatrics specifies that intensive care nurseries should be illuminated with fluorescent light at a light level of 60 foot-candles -- despile a study that demonstrated that 60 foot-candles increased the risk of retinopathy of prematurity.
Neonatologists say the intensive care nurseries are trying to recreate the environment of the womb, but somehow they forget that wombs don't come with lamps. Instead of developing in darkness as nature intended, a preemie's retinas receive, in less than three hours, more than 11 times the amount of irradiation recognized as the industrial danger limit for adult workers.
To make matters worse, the weak and immature preemies are not yet as resistant to light damage as the adults whom the guidelines protect.
In 1986, I wrote to the American Academy of Pediatrics and asked it to change its specifications on nursery lighting to less dangerous levels. It sent me a brush-off reply with the ritual affirmation that more research was needed.
It never replied to any of my follow-up letters. I wrote to many neonatologists and ophthalmologists but received either no reply or platitudes. Not one of the several dozen I wrote to challenged any of the material I had assembled, and not one lifted a finger to help preemies keep their eyesight.
I alerted the New York State Department of Health in 1987 about the mountain of evidence incriminating nursery lights. The people there promised to review the situation and then promptly lost my papers; after a year of my pleading for the babies and writing follow-up letters, they formed a technical advisory group to study the matter. This group is still "studying the matter" and the Department has not done anything to end the blinding.
Few laymen can successfully testify against a physician in medical matters, regardless of how ignorant and indifferent the physician may be. And physicians protect each other with a conspiracy of silence about their wrongdoings.
As long as these attitudes -- and this stubborness -- persist in the medical community, the epidemic of blinding will continue, and many preemies still to be born will have their eyes destroyed by a merciless torture we would no longer inflict on our worst enemies."
i like the it where once again when "our" medical community is approached about something which is covertly damaging our health,they just ignore it,i wonder why.
www.retinopathyofprematurity.org/maculardegeneration01.htm
www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=392434
nyc.indymedia.org/en/2007/01/81805.html
thus it can be seen that EM emitted from sources of illumination causes severe adverse health effects,just googling,lights and dizzyness on google leaves you with endless acounts of people whoes health is being sabotauged by the EM emitted from sources of illumination,everywhere people are complaining of it with symtoms from brain fog to suicidal thoughts,yet sources of luminscent negative EM are increasing at an alarming rate,as if the health warning are being completly ignored.i wonder why that is.
whats more people who are complaining of the health effects as with morgellons are treated as mentaly ill by the medical profession despite the fact thier adverse health effects have been proven by rationale and science!.
folks are being classified as bipolar and manic depressives and are being pescribed anti depressants and such for the effects of luminscent rogue EM!
if this does not ring your alarm bells i dont know what will,its clear the medical profession for some reason appear to be covering up certain irregualrities in our society,usually irregularities that damage our health such as morgellons,mond control and rogue EM.
heres some examples of peoples suffering,
www.thelupussite.com/forum/showthread.php?p=520617
i like lolalola who complains of memory blanks lasting up to two hours,this memory blank or missing time is when your being mind controled,its happening everywhere but once again its being ignored and being passed of as some bizzare medical excuse.
www.power-surge.com/php/forums/lofiversion/index.php/t4252.html
www.steadyhealth.com/i_m_constantly_dizzy_t173138.html
notice most of them refer to "light sensitivity" and being perscribed bi polar medication for thier ailments!!!!,what is going on!?,what has bi polarity got to so with rogue EM from light sources!?!?.