|
WORDS
Jun 12, 2007 8:13:10 GMT -5
Post by whiterose on Jun 12, 2007 8:13:10 GMT -5
At different points I have defined the meaning of different words, not because I don't think you are smart enough to know what they mean but because there is an obvious consorted effort to keep changing the words and the meanings.
The only reason I believe someone would do this is to add confusion to the language and the understanding of same. The control of words, like the control of the media is a power all unto itself. So in many ways our job is to simplify it to make things easier to understand for all, the end result is that more see what is truly happening with this affliction and its connections to this country and our world.
I point this out because of skytrolls post in Morgellons and the Bryozoans. Skytroll said they keep changing the names and that all realize that this is part of the game is one step toward understanding why such confusion.
George Orwell's book 1984 discusses the changing of meanings as does the movie V for Vendetta, both make excellent points.
|
|
|
WORDS
Jun 12, 2007 8:24:04 GMT -5
Post by whiterose on Jun 12, 2007 8:24:04 GMT -5
|
|
|
WORDS
Jun 12, 2007 11:27:33 GMT -5
Post by skytroll on Jun 12, 2007 11:27:33 GMT -5
Good articles Whiterose, I have looked at dictionaries, one that really got me was the Socialist one that was started many years ago, it is huge, and if you read the inside, you can clearly see how the use of words and especially over and over will be ingrained. I, however still like Webster. Noah Webster was a very intelligent person, and found that a language of the American people should be incorporated. Hence, the Webster Dictionary, from the beginning of America he was there. The One I refer to and most elitist use, is the Oxford Dictionary. In the past, anyway, but this means the well, those folks just never let go did they? Now, Wikipedia is put out by who? Anyone checked that out? You'd be surprised. What is GNU? Note: UNESCO and FSF run hand in hand? directory.fsf.org/copyleft, instead of copyright? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Free_Documentation_LicenseRight into the internet, remember who invented it? Check out Marc Tucker, head of Socialist education and friend and political education reformer from way back who has Hillary in his back pocket. There was a real thrust to control education from way back. Remember the letter to Hillary? Well, this man is running the education control program for US and has been for some time. Who controls what is taught at school? Notice how many politicians have their children go to private schools. The mainstream has taken a left hook. SKytroll
|
|
|
WORDS
Jun 12, 2007 11:32:39 GMT -5
Post by skytroll on Jun 12, 2007 11:32:39 GMT -5
|
|
|
WORDS
Jun 13, 2007 12:49:44 GMT -5
Post by skytroll on Jun 13, 2007 12:49:44 GMT -5
Now, here is an example of how words and taxonomic identification of species is providing a false sense of true discovery: "Stichotrichs. Significant confusion reigns regarding Stichotrich taxonomy. On one hand, two of the more prominently-studied stichotrichs, Oxytricha nova and Oxytricha trifallax have rightfully earned the term "nomen nudum" (Foissner and Berger 1999), having been isolated and named without any formal taxonomic description. On the other hand, Foissner and Berger (1999) changed the names of these two ciliates, placing them in the genus Sterkiella (S. nova and S. histriomuscorum, respectively); the effect has been to fragment the literature and destroy the continuity of citations of various published facts about the two." www.uga.edu/~protozoa/portal/stich_molec_bio.htmlOOPS......that leads me to this: www.genome.gov/10001844skytroll
|
|
|
WORDS
Jun 14, 2007 8:54:54 GMT -5
Post by booniesboy on Jun 14, 2007 8:54:54 GMT -5
Hi skytroll, Just a quick answer to your post (3 above). A short answer to 'GNU' and 'copyleft' - it is the basis of the 'OpenSource' movement that opposes the proprietary operating systems (such as Microsoft Windows - Vista et al) and often buggy software that runs on these systems. I don't know whether you've had this experience. I used Windows for many years and spent well over $5000 getting 'legal'. Most of the programs, such as 'Omnipage for Windows' were defective by design (I paid $1100 for the original buggy program) you had to purchase yet another upgrade or download another patch to get the thing working. Many people became frustrated with this expensive cycle of upgrading defective software/operating systems. OpenSource and the GNU foundation provided community-driven/written software programs and code free to anyone who wished to download it. The only stipulation in the license is that it had to remain free, and the license be with the program. I switched from Windows six years ago and haven't looked back. I've paid about $60 for well over 6gb of programs and operating systems. No more viruses, no trojans - none of the nasty stuff that Windows opens you up to. If interested try either Ubuntu or Mandriva - I use Mandriva 2006.0 for everything. www.ubuntu.com and www.store.mandriva.comI usually order all my disks (I have a very, very slow modem connection) from: thelinuxstore.caIf you are interested in knowing more about switching to a safe operating system, please pm me - I've triied most of them in my spare time. Sorry about the off-topic highjack of this thread, but it is relevant to part of what you were discussing. At least with the OpenSource community (very much like this forum) you are free to voice your opinion, contribute to the community, and enjoy freedom to use stuff that works. Hth, booniesboy
|
|
|
WORDS
Jun 21, 2007 22:13:40 GMT -5
Post by whiterose on Jun 21, 2007 22:13:40 GMT -5
I have been reading the lord of the rings and I wondered what would I find if I looked up the word precious, as this is what those controlled by the ring called it.
One interesting thing I found was Precious--Eucharist Definition= Most Precious Blood--we know there is something about ours.
wr
|
|
|
WORDS
Jun 21, 2007 23:27:49 GMT -5
Post by skytroll on Jun 21, 2007 23:27:49 GMT -5
|
|
|
WORDS
Jul 3, 2007 17:54:52 GMT -5
Post by whiterose on Jul 3, 2007 17:54:52 GMT -5
Have you noticed in a lot of their science they are using words, that are very simple and could mean several things, makes them harder to look up and ascertain exactly where they are going. I propose this has been done on purpose.
Several examples---smart dust--dust that knows where it is going, dust that can control you, the weather and just about any where your mind can take it and beings they have disavowed ethics from science, that does mean any where.
Blank slate technology (BST)...is a form of time travel that enables the re-write of history at which are called intervention points.
Or could it also be, wiping a persons life away and then rebuilding it as THEY see fit. Could they also use this terminology to create the perfect solider?
Hence, my computers start to finish post under alter theories, and how do I know, I've had this 26 years thats how I know.
|
|
|
WORDS
Jul 20, 2007 14:11:21 GMT -5
Post by whiterose on Jul 20, 2007 14:11:21 GMT -5
Here is a Quote for you from John Victor Ramses, picked it up at Red Ice Creations:
I would rather spend my life searching for the truth than rest a single day within the comfort of a lie.
WOW!
|
|
|
WORDS
Aug 2, 2007 22:11:48 GMT -5
Post by whiterose on Aug 2, 2007 22:11:48 GMT -5
|
|
|
WORDS
Aug 15, 2007 7:43:20 GMT -5
Post by whiterose on Aug 15, 2007 7:43:20 GMT -5
|
|
|
WORDS
Aug 15, 2007 8:06:26 GMT -5
Post by whiterose on Aug 15, 2007 8:06:26 GMT -5
|
|
|
WORDS
Sept 7, 2007 21:14:07 GMT -5
Post by whiterose on Sept 7, 2007 21:14:07 GMT -5
|
|