|
Post by karenw on Jul 27, 2007 17:03:33 GMT -5
I must be getting into this a quite late because lillsissy just emailed this to me. By the dates it looks like old info but It's news to me: www.morgellons-uk.net/agrobacterium.htmIn short it says agrobacterium radiobacter was found in two Morgellons patients DNA!!!:: Skin biopsy samples from two Morgellons patients were subjected to high-stringency PCR testing for genes encoded by the Agrobacterium chromosome. Screening of the same samples for Agrobacterium virulence (vir) genes and T-DNA sequences in the patient's genome was also performed. Results: PCR screening indicated the presence of Agrobacterium genes derived both from the chromosome and from the Ti plasmid, including the T-DNA, in tissues from both Morgellons patients. A follow-up found the same in 3 more! Can anybody tell me why they couldn't go one step further identify the type. Is it the wild (found in nature) or the GMO Agrobacterium Radiobacter k 84 or Agrobacterium Radiobacter k 1046. I have long suspected the 1046. www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=85827There has to a connection. karen W
|
|
|
Post by whiterose on Aug 2, 2007 15:10:45 GMT -5
If you found this interesting, you might also find the last article I posted under aliens exist quite intriguing!
|
|
|
Post by gracebeours on Aug 2, 2007 15:26:36 GMT -5
The agrobacterium is c 58.
|
|
|
Post by whiterose on Aug 2, 2007 16:06:43 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by prevenge on Aug 5, 2007 23:32:16 GMT -5
I must be getting into this a quite late because lillsissy just emailed this to me. By the dates it looks like old info but It's news to me: www.morgellons-uk.net/agrobacterium.htmIn short it says agrobacterium radiobacter was found in two Morgellons patients DNA!!!:: Skin biopsy samples from two Morgellons patients were subjected to high-stringency PCR testing for genes encoded by the Agrobacterium chromosome. Screening of the same samples for Agrobacterium virulence (vir) genes and T-DNA sequences in the patient's genome was also performed. Results: PCR screening indicated the presence of Agrobacterium genes derived both from the chromosome and from the Ti plasmid, including the T-DNA, in tissues from both Morgellons patients. A follow-up found the same in 3 more! Can anybody tell me why they couldn't go one step further identify the type. Is it the wild (found in nature) or the GMO Agrobacterium Radiobacter k 84 or Agrobacterium Radiobacter k 1046. I have long suspected the 1046. www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=85827There has to a connection. karen W doesn't say anything about agrobacterium being found in morgellons patients dna. that's actually impossible. that would be like a Cruise Liner stuck in a highway full of cars. Doesn't fit. id DOES say that agrobacterium was found in skin samples.doesn't' say anything about plant dna in morgellons sufferers either. though, that can be challenged, as many morgellons sufferers shed and exude "things" that test positive for plant dna, but this report doesn't say that. says that agrobacterium is found in morgellons sufferer's skin samples. agrobacterium can CHANGE people's DNA.. and DELIVER DNA into our genes ... but you don't' go and find agrobacterium "inside" our DNA. i wish you'd refine your search and your reporting before you go screaming your head off about something and misrepresenting the facts. it's just not fair to fellow sufferers. I know you mean well. but you stated falsehoods and it's not going to fly when I read it and have to correct you. thanks for the effort. nothing personal. just need to make a correction where a mistake is made. you can do the same to me. much love.. -M
|
|
|
Post by mfromcanada on Aug 9, 2007 17:29:44 GMT -5
I read an article a while back about a man in Vancouver, Canada who had green blood.
|
|