|
Post by whiterose on Mar 6, 2007 16:56:37 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by whiterose on Mar 6, 2007 18:53:33 GMT -5
QUESTION: We know the Rh Negs are Rare, but have you ever seen any Statistics on whether it is Mainly MALES or FEMALES who are born with the Rh NEGATIVE type? THE DEFINITION OF A TYPICAL RARE BLOOD TYPE, shows thatthe type O Rh Negatives are not only missing the RHESUS Factor, but are ALSO missing ALL OF THE OTHER FACTORS FOUND IN Rh POSITIVE BLOOD (and then shows you the list of those Factors: D, C, E, c, e, M, S Le(a), K, Fy(a), Fy(b), Jk(a) and Jk(b)). I find this ASTOUNDING! Rh O NEGATIVE Blood is TOTALLY BLANK of ALL the FACTORS found in Rh POSITIVE Blood! Do you see what it is that I'm pointing out to you? O Rh negative blood is minus all the other factors as well. They probably can't CLONE us because there is NOTHING in our BLOOD that CAN BE CLONED! I don't understand how CLONING works, but don't you find it AMAZING that Rh NEGATIVE type O Blood appears to be MISSING ANY REAL DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS -- other than the fact that it is MINUS the Rhesus Factor?
This came from windsong!
|
|
|
Post by whiterose on Mar 6, 2007 23:12:31 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by whiterose on Mar 7, 2007 17:53:41 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by whiterose on Mar 7, 2007 17:55:53 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by mfromcanada on Mar 7, 2007 21:04:56 GMT -5
great links again.
|
|
|
Post by whiterose on Mar 14, 2007 10:04:58 GMT -5
The reason this connected for me, is the part of the Tower of Babylon. I have read much that has indicated that God then put forth many languages, so that one could not understand the other. Does it not seem that when we attempt to speak to others who no not the disease of Morgellons first hand that they look at you with a blank stare, they do not understand. Could instead of a language, could it be describing something that is so indescribable, that instead of understanding all one receives is more confusion. www.redicecreations.com/winterwonderland/stoneofscone.htmlwr
|
|
|
Post by whiterose on Apr 2, 2007 0:18:20 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by whiterose on Apr 2, 2007 14:25:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by whiterose on Apr 10, 2007 19:04:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by whiterose on Apr 15, 2007 16:26:51 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by whiterose on May 11, 2007 21:22:24 GMT -5
Based on the frequencies of the RHD silent allele in Europe, we can also estimate that about 55-60% of RH positive Americans have one RHD silent allele. In general there is about a 1 in 3 chance of two Rh positive Americans (of predominately European ancestory both having one RHD silent allele.
taken from Wikepedia
|
|
|
Post by whiterose on May 12, 2007 8:27:35 GMT -5
No matter what is in our blood, that makes us more or less susceptible to morgellons, we are human beings. Even if there was a genetic manipulation at some point it does not make us any less a part of this world.
When folks attempt to dehumanize a group it reminds me of predatory behavior in a mass murderer. They dehumanize them in order to facilitate their justification of abuse on them, to make it ok to respond to them as lesser than. It makes it easier from the predators standpoint to than commit acts that would normally be classified as immoral. The world has huge issues right now, more so than many of us could have imagined would be occurring in our life time. Throughout history there have been times when sick people have been targeted for the reason the world had its ails. Get rid of that group and the world will be ok, it is there fault that the world is in such a mess.
The directors of this nightmare (those responsible for this disease) will sit back and laugh as human beings take it out on their own kind, rather than look for those at the top of the chain that are the actual culprits. All should be very cautious who they point the finger at, remember that finger can always come directly back to you. Forget those that are just a cog in the wheel, those that put this into our environment unknowingly thinking they were doing a good thing. Look for the maker of this insidious nightmare, that is where the real justice will take place.
whiterose
|
|
|
Post by whiterose on Jun 28, 2007 12:28:02 GMT -5
What if you were concerned about population, would it not be better to have someone that could not produce offspring so easily. The Rh negative factor fits this model---ah yes, but a problem does arise with them. Often, the Rh negative factor folks are big time truth seekers and hard headed, hard to control, so how do we fix this. Some of you may have Rh positive blood but an Rh negative factor on the DNA, could it be at some point, they just insert something into the air, our food, our water that kills off the Rh positive and than they control the Rh negative with fibers.
Just a very sick thought, but is it plausible?
|
|
|
Post by mfromcanada on Jul 4, 2007 10:45:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by whiterose on Jul 21, 2007 14:06:55 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by whiterose on Jul 23, 2007 11:06:40 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by whiterose on Aug 27, 2007 21:56:25 GMT -5
They are asking Latinos to donate blood as they say their blood is the most "universal type blood". I was a bit perplexed by this because the blood type they are speaking of is O positive. It is O negative that is considered the universal type blood. Perhaps with their new fungus cutting tool that creates negative from positive, this would explain the article, or perhaps someone is more confused than I. www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20464500/
|
|
|
Post by maggiemae on Aug 27, 2007 23:38:45 GMT -5
There is no universal blood donor type. Donated blood is routinely classified by type as A, B, AB or O, and as Rh positive or Rh negative. In the past, people with Type O/Rh negative blood were considered universal blood donors. This implied that anyone, regardless of blood type, could receive Type O/Rh negative blood without risking a transfusion reaction.
But scientists now have a much better understanding of the complex issues related to reactions to incompatible blood donor types. Even donors with Type O/Rh negative blood may have antibodies in their blood that cause serious reactions. ~ Mayo Clinic
O+ is the most common (1 in 3 persons, 38%) so that's why it is more desirable - odds are better someone needing blood is O+. A+ has very close ratios (32%) as the next most needed. Mm
|
|
|
Post by maggiemae on Aug 27, 2007 23:52:41 GMT -5
Oh yeah, Whiterose....I think you are onto something serious....I have been thinking about it for YEARS now....I was studying about O+'s and their distribution in the world...got a map and it might just be me being out there, but I seemed to see a pattern of decimation, aniahlation, and destruction of those peoples.... www.bloodbook.com/world-abo.htmlIt's you O-'s that really got them bad boys with wedgies!!!, (like "no reflection"), lol!!* Mm
|
|
|
Post by whiterose on Aug 28, 2007 18:10:11 GMT -5
As the country is placed more in the powers of the good, might be interesting to look see and check the obituaries from the last 10 years, bet it would be really telling----
|
|
|
Post by whiterose on Sept 3, 2007 9:25:49 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by whiterose on Sept 7, 2007 20:28:57 GMT -5
Human Anomalies to Support Intervention by Patty Stevenson
There are those that are always trying to promote the evolutionary theory concerning the development of humans. And on the other side of the coin are those supporting the Creationist theory. If I had to choose between them, I would have to go with the creationist theory but not because I think that a divine being stirred up a bunch of mud, formed a human body and called it human.
But what I do believe is that humans are a product of genetic manipulation. There are several anomalies involving humans that can support this idea. In this article I will attempt to present some of the anomalies. I will not attempt to prove the theory. If scientist can't prove that humans evolved or were created, I certainly cannot.
In my previous article I talked about blood types, specifically the RH-negative factor. The rh-negative blood types are present in only humans, with one exception that I could find and that was a mule. Of the human blood types, O, A, B and AB, it is suggested that O types is the very oldest and is ancient by evolutionary standards….
Anthropological, biological, and genetic evidence all put the origin of modern humans at between 200,000 and 100,000 years ago, probably in Africa. The latest studies on mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) support the theory that Homo sapiens emerged in Africa and later migrated into other regions. O type probably appeared early at the appearance of one of our first direct ancestors, Cro-Magnon, around 40,000 B.C. in Africa, mid continent.
However, the study of blood type distribution does not support that theory. The most reasonable theory, so far, is one that supposes that modern man first developed in central Asia if the mutations that produced the A and B antigens are ancient, the gene for blood group O is infinitely older.
Blood group A initially appeared in any significant numbers in the early Caucasian peoples, sometime between 25,000 and 15,000 B.C., somewhere in western Asia or the Middle East. The gene for group A was carried into Western Europe and Asia during the movement of these Neolithic societies, especially a branch termed the Indo-Europeans.
Unlike blood groups B and O, there are many varieties of group A. The major grouping, A1, accounts for about ninety-five percent of all A blood. The largest subgroup, A2, is found principally in Northern Caucasians. A2 is found in very high concentration in Iceland and Scandinavia, particularly among the Lapps, ancient settlers of the area. They are almost unique in their high frequency of A, and have the highest frequency of A2, registering forty-two percent in one group. The A2 gene is almost entirely confined to Caucasian populations.
The European frequency of group A decreases as we head eastwards. Over much of Europe the frequency of the A gene is greater than twenty-five percent. It is also found in considerable numbers around the entire Mediterranean Sea, particularly in Corsica, Sardinia, Spain, Turkey, and the Balkans. It is clear that humankind most often laid down permanent settlements in those areas where conditions offered them the best chance of survival.
Blood group A seems to be the last defined blood group to appear. It seems to originate in the Caucasian people and in an area described as the cradle of humanity.
Could the blood type distribution be a clue to the origins of the most modern version of humans - Today’s humans?
Beginning around 50,000 B.C. Agriculture and animal domestication are generally recognized as the hallmarks of a modern outburst of cultural human behavior. Archaeologists date the oldest evidence of burial ceremonies, body ornaments, and cave paintings in Europe and agricultural evidence starts to appear shortly afterwards.
It is during a period of time lasting about 10,000 years that most of modern food crops and domesticated animals show up in the fossil records. Some with direct evolutionary connections but most without.
At some point in the last 100,000 years, humans made a giant leap from the rest of the pack. A new human appeared which possessed a human genome with 223 genes that did not have the required predecessors on the genomic evolutionary tree. Where did they come from?
If you follow the evolution theory then you know that in the evolutionary progression from bacteria to invertebrates to vertebrates and finally modern humans, these 223 genes are completely missing from the invertebrate phase.
In a recently evolutionary time, modern humans acquired an extra 223 genes. Not through gradual evolution, not vertically on the Tree of Life, but horizontally as a sideways insertion of genetic material. The only natural way to gain this genetic material would be through bacterial insertion. Later, in this article, I will explain how this was very unlikely.
Each gene in a string of DNA makes an impact on us. Every single gene makes a great difference to every individual human. To take a hominoid and introduce 223 NEW genes made an immense difference to a species to create humans.
The human genome is made up of about 3 billion neucleotides. Just a little more than 1 percent of them are grouped into functioning genes. Each gene contains about 1000 neucleotides. The difference between you and I amounts to one neucleotides in 1000 or 1 gene. The difference between man and chimps is less than 1 percent as genes go: and 1 percent of 30,000 genes is 300. So 223 genes is more than 2/3 of the difference between humans and chimps. That’s a huge leap with no predecessors.
But not so large with some outside intervention.
The functions of these 223 genes were analyzed through the proteins that they contained. The analysis, conducted by the Public Consortium team and published in the journal Nature, revealed that they contained proteins that are involved in important physiological and psychiatric functions. They were also responsible for important neurological enzymes that stem only from the mitochondrial portion of the DNA. The mitochondrial portion of the DNA that humans inherit ONLY through the mother line. That fact, alone, raises doubt regarding the bacterial insertion explanation.
"It is a jump that does not follow current evolutionary theories," said Steven Scherer, director of mapping of the Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine. "We did not identify a strongly preferred bacterial source for the putative horizontally transferred genes," states the report in Nature.
The Public Consortium team, conducting a detailed search, found that some 113 genes (out of the 223) "are widespread among bacteria" - though they are entirely absent even in invertebrates. An analysis of the proteins which the enigmatic genes express showed that out of 35 identified, only ten had counterparts in vertebrates (ranging from cows to rodents to fish); 25 of the 35 were unique to humans.
"It is not clear whether the transfer was from bacteria to human or from human to bacteria," Science quoted Robert Waterson, co-director of Washington University's Genome Sequencing Center, as saying. But if Man gave those genes to bacteria, where did Man acquire those genes to begin with?
How did we come to possess the unique extra genes?
All animals and other living creatures known to man can breed with any other of their species. Relative size and color makes no difference. Why does infant's haemolytic disease occur in humans if all humans are the same species?
Haemolytic disease is the allergic reaction that occurs when an Rh-negative mother is carrying an Rh-positive child. Her blood builds up poisonous antibodies to destroy an ALIEN substance (the same way it would a virus), thereby destroying the infant. Why would a mother's body reject her own offspring? Nowhere else in nature does this occur naturally. This same problem does occur in mules - a cross between a horse and donkey. This fact alone points to the distinct possibility of a crossbreeding between two similar but genetically different species.
In conclusion of this article, I suggest that enough evidence exists to cause one to ponder on the real origins of humanity. Are we a natural result of evolution? Or was there some amount of intervention from an outside source. Many religious texts from around the world do suggest some type of creating was done. Could it have been genetic tampering by a highly technologically advanced race not from our Earth?
You Decide-
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Sept 7, 2007 21:17:44 GMT -5
We are what we are at this moment. What if God is ET? Ashes to ashes Dust to dust Dust, particles, atoms, we are one with the universe, not earth. In Gaia, women rule, In the Universere, Men do. Dust to dust Ashes to ashes Why did the Bible stop being written after Revelations? Or was it? We can't leave the soul out. Now matter itself, might be the source. The Third Element of the Blood, Bechamp might tell us more, ...The reader should be aware when reading The Third Element of the Blood that in formulating his microzymian theory of biological organisation, Bechamp in no way sought to establish it as the last word on the subjects of disease, its transmission, general physiology, or indeed the organisation of living matter itself. The Professor worked until a few weeks before his death; even if he were working now, he would no doubt still regard his work as unfinished. It is no accident but rather a vindication of the truth of Bechamp's theories that many researchers over the course of the twentieth century have arrived at hypotheses and conclusions in various disciplines that concur with the microzymian model ....... "One such unfortunate is Basil Wainright, an American responsible for a process known as polyatomic apheresis, an advanced form of oxygen therapy which has proven itself to be effective enough against Aids and cancer for it to be worth banning. At the time of writing, he has spent three years in prison without being charged with any offence, his medications for Parkinson's disease have been tampered with, and clinics using polyatomic apheresis have been raided and closed. Similar stories could be told concerning many other products and practices, including Essiac and other herbal therapies, which should have been greeted with open arms, but have instead been marginalised by the establishment. " ...."The Germ Theory is convenient because it provides what every simplistic view of a problem seeks before all else: a culprit, an invisible hare for the hounds to chase in their costly research labs, universities, hospitals, and drug factories. The fact that the hare can never be caught is the perfect guarantee that their race will never finish, their demands for funding will never cease, and their ability to generate profits for the drug and chemical corporations will continue to grow. There is no single cause of disease. The ancients thought this, Bechamp proved it and was written out of history for his trouble, and now the same thing is being done to those whose work, consciously or otherwise, carries on from where Bechamp's left off. The relevance of his work to the dilemmas that beset modern medical science remains as yet unrealised. This book is being republished with the intention of being one small element in the movement that will correct that situation. The original English edition of 1912, translated from the French by Dr M. Leverson, has until now been available only as a facsimile reproduction. This new edition has been reset, in a new layout that it is hoped will make the content much more accessible. Wherever it has been possible without altering the intent of the author, archaic or ambiguous use of English has been brought up to date. Please note that even though the text is from a published book, there is *no* copyright attached to it. Feel free to use and distribute it in any way you see fit - in fact, the further and wider the better. ** End of Publisher's Preface ** " ......"The living being, filled with microzymas, carries in itself the elements essential for life, disease, death and destruction. And that this variety in results may not too much surprise us, the processes are the same. Our cellules, it is a matter of constant observation, are being continually destroyed by means of a fermentation very analogous to that which follows death. Penetrating into the heart of these phenomena we might really say, were it not for the offensiveness of the expression, that we are constantly rotting. " www.alternativehealth.co.nz/articles/blood.htmFermentation, by dear Watson..... ........so simple, yet we still cannot get it........ Kajander and Folk still following this, knowing too it is matter, these scientists are now being dissed, as is Reich, Dr. Clark, all those who know from whence disease comes, not from genes, but matter can mutate genes. Matter, atoms, proteins, nano, mimicking nature. We can see where we are and where we are going, but from whence did it all come? Is "smart dust" recreated dust or matter now in conflict with "real dust and matter" Is Dark Energy and Light Energy, both free energy determining which way we proceed? Dark energy, from the dark matter, vacuum, vs the Light energy which flows all around us? Is Zero point, dark or light energy? What is anti-matter? Dark or light? Every point we go, the dichotomy, the dualism goes, If one eats of the Tree of Knowlege and keeps to himself, he has erred mankind. Skytroll According to Daniel in the Old Testament: All other reigns have gone, we are at the feet: Clay and Iron Dust to Dust stone (the remains the smallest part) Ashes to ashes fire (remains, what is left from the fire) SKytroll
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Sept 8, 2007 2:22:49 GMT -5
Gems in history: coming to light today?..............Particulate matter in the blood? Particulate matter, is it real canalicular?...... Canalicular: www.biology-online.org/dictionary/BodilyWow........I am seeing the lights, both of them.............................the real and the synthetic It is not the genes, it is the cell, itself.......................oh........my.......I see it! There is more than just the particular matter........... Take your pick GENES vs CELLS GENES vs fermentation GENES vs PROTEINS GENES vs matter................I must calm myself down, here. Spontaneous generation, cannot be in GENES..............is in cells.................... It is not evolution...........is spontaneous generation...............jumping genes.....my foot> oh my.............got the history and the connect to today, what is in toward future is the synthetic nano, not the real nanobacteria.............mycrozymias, microbes today........... but the genes of the microbes were altered, Principles: Nothing is created...................nothing is lost....................Lavoisiers Nothing is but what ought to be.......................................Galileo Nothing is the prey of death.............Everything is the prey of life............... But, today........I find this: on particulate matter;;;;;;;; Original 2003................ www.fda.gov/cber/infosheets/bldpartic.htmSept 8,2007................. www.fda.gov/cber/faq/prtbldfaq.htmIt is in the blood.........................it is all in the blood.................cells.........etc........ "the little animicules" the little mycrozymias......... filaments, fibers, fibrin...........from the cell.....membrance breaking open. look at structure: submembrane filament: www.clt.astate.edu/wwilliam/hem_i_hemostasis.htmSKytroll
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Sept 8, 2007 2:29:23 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Sept 8, 2007 2:32:33 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Sept 8, 2007 2:36:11 GMT -5
Artificial fibrin and submembrane filaments: artificial cells, blood substitutes: www.medicine.mcgill.ca/artcell/whoooooooooooooahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhkickkkkkkkkkksomeeeeeeeeeeee! SKytroll
|
|
|
Post by whiterose on Sept 8, 2007 16:56:49 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by whiterose on Sept 9, 2007 22:24:50 GMT -5
If you haven't read skytrolls post on how the FDA checks the blood supply, it is a must read, you won't know whether you should laugh or cry.
|
|