|
Post by nanofairlady on Jul 9, 2007 23:56:41 GMT -5
Dear micromike, news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/07/070706-weird-aliens.html I dont know why your scientists dont make your theories serious!!! "Let's be a little more broad-minded. Let's not just look for life as we know it," Shostak said. this sentence is the same you have said several times. www.marslife.com/reflections.htm www.marslife.com/oldmarslife/colony.html and this is the time he doesnt know the material he found in the meteorite is silicon before meeting a Morgellons case that time,and then Dr.hilda tested and approved it is silicon,and the exam material you found in the fibers of Morgellons. "1. Microscopically both fiber samples have head and body features resembling typical Morgellon fibers. 2. The FT-Raman spectra provided by Lambda Solutions, Inc. (No. 12938-1) and MIT (No. 12938-7) have vibrations from aliphatics and aromatics. In addition, 3.5 % silicon was present in one area. 3. The Raman spectra indicate the presence of an organic polymer but did not identify it." With great respect for her scientific efforts and her spiritual mind BUT I have to say she skipped a lot from a scientific conclusion and told"The Meteorite sample appears to be contaminated by a person who has Morgellon's or has been exposed to nanotubes made of silica-carbon or nanotechnology. " this result is superficial in my viewpoint, NO Strong document is behind it. Isnt the time to look with a little more broad-minded? When the scientists say today" "It's a carbon world, so there's plenty of different kinds of carbon compounds there, and the possibility is that there may be the carbon compounds that make up life," said John Baross, an oceanographer at Seattle's University of Washington, who lead the report team. so there wouldnt be so surprize if he shows www.marslife.com/oldmarslife/oworm.htm A broad-minded scientist should consider every possibilty.. It isnot important who is winner,who is loser...it is important to find the truth..to save humanity. I appreciate every scientists and non-scientist people who has worked on Morgellons so far ,but please Get together your broad-minded minds for God and to forget "WHO IS WINNER"for a while. Then you can solve the problem of many patients who are suffering days and nights. Regards nano fair lady --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
david
New Member
Posts: 32
|
Post by david on Jul 10, 2007 19:23:01 GMT -5
Do you want to repeat what you are implying here?
Are you suggesting an off-world angle for morgellons?
Lloyd Pye's starchild skull has what seem to be fibers in the bone. This to me makes this whole approach one, as you seem to be suggesting, worth considering.
|
|
|
Post by maggiemae on Jul 10, 2007 21:14:36 GMT -5
Ya know, it's been a while since I felt like posting a thing....but this...ha! How convenient....just imagine, USA patriotic, red, white, and blue fibers along with nanoPROBES that hitched a ride back on the space shuttle.....lmao.... that way, let's say similar to how the insurance adjusters do it...
Not our fault, no way man, it wasn't me, and we are denying all coverage due to: (let me guess...)
"AN ACT OF GOD"
and try getting him to admit it or sueing him or obtaining any restitution or taking Him to criminal court..... How convenient. Follow me? Mm
|
|
|
Post by nanofairlady on Jul 10, 2007 22:26:34 GMT -5
Mag, I said his theory,,not mine. Theory means the things need to be worked on...nanotech is a theory too. When Galileo told planet Earth is round they arrested him and told "he is crazy"too..because he said a strange thing...the people didnt like to hear. We always like to hear an easy and convenient thing...for example If I say the origin of Morgellons is in your pillow it is a good thing because you can throw it away. I dont defend any theory ,,no human-made(nanotech)..no alien-made(meteorite)..but the truth wont change with my pleasure or yours. I want to find the truth..for the people who are suffering. It seems you even didnt look at the pictures correctly ...on www.marslife.com/oldmarslife/oworm.htmhe wrote several years a go,before knowin Morgellons in the world you live,that he has seen the same glassies in the other meteorites in Roswell too...the glassies was near a terresterial fly ...it is valuable because may it helps to know the ways of contamination...it needs to be worked on. This is the way of proving a scientific conclusion,,not to say "I dont like it"..this sentence doesnt help anyone. Every prejudice means no knowledge...and you cant solve your problem with no knowledge. Bless u nano fair lady
|
|
|
Post by nanofairlady on Aug 31, 2007 12:28:27 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by nanofairlady on Sept 18, 2007 23:09:49 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by nanofairlady on Sept 20, 2007 6:29:30 GMT -5
Nature presents some non organic crystals in organic world very beautiful…Magnetotactic bacteria ://www.springerlink.com/content/nk606165v277r875/ They are influenced by magnetic properties of Earth and they live in the level of water and ground which has a special level of oxygen .They have non organic magnetic crystals (35-120 nm).These crystals make a nano compass which helps bacteria move along magnetic field lines. adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006JPCM...18.2815LThe ability of magnetotactic bacteria (MTB) to navigate along magnetic field lines is based on unique nanosized organelles (magnetosomes), which are membrane-enclosed intracellular crystals of a magnetic iron mineral that assemble into highly ordered chain-like structures. The biomineralization of magnetosomes is a process with genetic control over the accumulation of iron, the deposition of the magnetic crystal within a specific compartment, as well as the assembly, alignment and intracellular organization of particle chains. Magnetite crystals produced by MTB have uniform species-specific morphologies and sizes, which are mostly unknown from inorganic systems. The unusual characteristics of magnetosome particles have attracted a great interdisciplinary interest and inspired numerous ideas for their biotechnological application www.jbc.org/cgi/content/full/278/10/8745.http://www.springerlink.com/content/vlr7u3u0647r0q41/" Motion of flagellate bacteria is considered from the point of view of rigid body mechanics. As a general case we consider a flagellate coccus magnetotactic bacterium swimming in a fluid in the presence of an external magnetic field. The proposed model generalizes previous approaches to the problem and allows one to access parameters of the motion that can be measured experimentally. The results suggest that the strong helical pattern observed in typical trajectories of magnetotactic bacteria can be a biological advantage complementary to magnetic orientation. In the particular case of zero magnetic interaction the model describes the motion of a non-magnetotactic coccus bacterium swimming in a fluid. Theoretical calculations based on experimental results are compared with the experimental track obtained by dark field optical microscopy." This kind of bacteria can live among layers of the ground,,they can live among layers of a Martian rock..they only need to make an escape way to reach the body..they have special magnetic property which can make crawling sensation,,they can attach neurofibers.. So if there is an electrical property in Morgellons fibers,why shouldn’t we search about the possibility of cure by nano-tech instead blaming.. Nanotechnology can make magnetic nanoparticles which can bound to the agent..to cure..this is an assumption..and scientists should boil it. Regards Nano fair lady
|
|
|
Post by nanofairlady on Sept 20, 2007 9:06:18 GMT -5
My friend asked what you mean cure by nanotechnology. I explain more,,one of the ways to recognize intracellular HIV virus is using magnetic nano tech particles bound to specified antibody,,when antibody join viral particles you can found magnetic effects of particles by special devices . one of nanotechnology goals is cure and scientists can find which type of Antibodies is high in Morgies blood circulations or the other fluids..it can be done by Electrophoresis or some other methods..then they can make magnetic nanoparticles by nanotechnology bound to the specific Antibodies,,,Antibody has a specific site to joint with the agent,,and they can follow it by available special methods.. Try thinking and Send my voice to your scientists..
|
|
|
Post by whiterose on Sept 20, 2007 9:13:14 GMT -5
The definition of theory: discuss the word theory Definition of theory (noun) a possible explanation of why something exists or how something happens using experiments or ideas, but which is not yet proven The reason I post this is because I believe Dr. Hildegarde Staningers work has proved much more than theory. Here is the mp3 if you haven't yet heard it, and the photos are quite telling: rense.gsradio.net:8080/rense/special/rensemorgellons10.mp3
|
|
|
Post by whiterose on Sept 20, 2007 9:21:09 GMT -5
And on a personal note, I think maggiemae has hit it right on, especially considering all the following of folks on the computer and phone taps. They are looking for a way out, those responsible. As Dave Larsons papers pointed directly to the DOD and NIH, seems many of the things we found in our bodies they have been making. Here is that link: www.larsonmedia.net/nih.htm
|
|
|
Post by nanofairlady on Sept 20, 2007 9:24:55 GMT -5
Dear Whiterose, I am speaking about possible cure,,not conspiracy theory. I respect all of Hilda's work or every other person who tries to help,,but which theory could bring CURE? your scientists can use the power of nanotechnology for cure .. I dont mean to pull down anyone..this isnot my job..my job is finding the truth..and seeing the truth needs an open eye and open mind.. bless u
|
|
|
Post by whiterose on Sept 20, 2007 9:34:47 GMT -5
Agreed, I have posted before the things I do believe will bring the cure, and as the cause I believe is nano, I believe nano could bring the cure, I also as previously stated believe frequency of sorts could also bring a cure.
Whichever is chosen must be done with great research, we already know the harm nano can cause, we know the harm to much electrical current or even the wrong frequency of same could cause them to go into overdrive.
I do not wish to attack those developing nano, but I am asking for ethical behavior from those in all sciences, something that has seemed to be lacking. Pandora's Box has been opened, now the question is what are we going to do about it. Do we sit back and suggest that more GMO products can't hurt at this point.
We need responsible action, based on the consideration of all, not just those in power, IMO.
|
|
|
Post by nanofairlady on Sept 20, 2007 13:33:11 GMT -5
Be strong on whatever you believe..whatever is ,it is worthful because you are thinking to solve a problem..Hilda's thoughts..Wymore's..Moore's..and so on...All of them are trying to help..so all are respectful..I dont believe in any of those theories till it is proved correctly..then I bravely accept..The only thing is important for me is finding a cure way..I live in Iran,,I came to USA this summer to help a research group,but they didnt want to accept me as I am a foreigner,I was not a member of them..and it is acceptable..
But I am so happy you agree with the cure by nanotechnology...I searched about electric powers of microbs and viruses..and MTB was the best microbe has this property.. And I read about cures by nanotech devices..and this is a single thought..it needs to be worked on,,but IT IS POSSIBLE TO BE DONE..and you need to speak with your scientists.. If you ask me why I love to help,I say because I am a human being..no other profit is behind my work..because someday if your Gov dont kill us,,such diseases will knock our door..and I want to be ready for the time.
|
|
|
Post by nanofairlady on Sept 21, 2007 21:03:47 GMT -5
I post my PM"You idea is brilliant. Good thinking - it may yet lead to a answer and cure. I will pass it on to some nanotech folks here at the lab. I have long thought that Morgies use the interdermal capillarial system to move about the body. And it would make sense if they were iron reactive and magneticly charge nano particles. It would therefore be logical to use such technbiques as bio coupling of charged particles to facilitate identifcation and possibly eradication with MRI machines. Who knows? Any way, I am certain of the bacterial connection between Morgellons and the sores. Over the last 2 years I have tried many antibiotics with no result on the Morgies. These include: Omniceph IV, Rocepherin IV, Augmentin, Amoxicyllin, Ciprofloxacin, & Cefdinir. If I wash the Morgy wounds with Alcohol they respond slightly but very little. ALcohol makes it easy to swab off samples to study in my microsope, however. If I use Hydrogen Peroxide, they really get upset and open up into bigger wounds! An interesting reaction but it makes the wounds take longer to heal. Even the use of colloidal silver washing and wet bandages helps reduce the infection but it does not entirely kill the little buggers. I wish I had a good microscope and a decent lab to study the clinical effects of various known agents."
|
|
|
Post by nanofairlady on Sept 21, 2007 22:31:04 GMT -5
I like whiterose speed in sending the links..
|
|
|
Post by nanofairlady on Sept 25, 2007 1:53:18 GMT -5
|
|
ruth
Junior Member
Posts: 60
|
Post by ruth on Sept 25, 2007 22:04:21 GMT -5
by 2010, is the projection of that video.
the part that bothers me with nanobots is i have yet to see how they are recovered once they are introduced into a system.
i envision software with probes that keep them "at rest" or a strong magnetic chamber to sit in a couple times a day to keep them quiet. of course, 'the powers that be' could probably zap us with one of their frequencies, daily to keep them down?
i wonder if dave larsen got infected while working on nano tech research?
i continue to produce moths from my skin. i have some 'saved' for hilde if she wants to do dna comparisons to a biological moth.
yes, if THEY would quit denying us, a solution could be found.
|
|
|
Post by maggiemae on Sept 25, 2007 23:16:42 GMT -5
My two cents worth....not spammy drivel as bugsonline (certainly not a thinking man...) likens my thoughts to...
I suggest that we think very deeply about allowing anyone to "consentingly" add more nano to our bodies with the "hopes" of removing what are already there. It could make for a real hell of a party trying to sort out "whose" nanos were there first, whose caused the damage, and more importantly...who should be prosecuted. Don't get me wrong, if nano was the reason that they developed a total cancer cure, God bless em....I may have been "talked" into volunteering. I am about the big picture. However, being used in a most heinous, secret, experimental clinical trial that has been ongoing for 15 or so years, is criminal. The arrogance and egos of those involved will be their demise. Their elitist attitudes will be held up to the ultimate highest power in time. I am certain that money, fame, greed, all the wrong reasons for doing this to us, motivated them....power, control, can't forget those. There are clear rights and wrongs....it's black or white...the greys....pergatory? My point is that this is equivalent to perpetutual rape. We have been violated in a most devious way. I believe it was done deliberately and knowingly. I believe we were led to various sites to be observed, psychologically, symptomatically, and God only knows what other avenues this "golden opportunity" has benefited from scads of our data. My thoughts are - if their children, moms, dads, family pets, and themselves had been subject to the EXACT same atrocities, probing, surveillance, violation of privacy and health, their quality of life, entire being in this world for that matter....how would they react? Would it be, "yeah, gee, nano.....the future, yeah, sorry family, friends, etc....you know, caught in the cross-fire...friendly, of course...." I DON'T THINK SO. Selfish, they are, too. What they have done is criminal and I don't care how you gloss it over, the truth is the truth. CRIMINAL. They may have got the OK from the DoD, NIH, UN.....or who-the-hell ever, what they have done is still wrong. It would be equivalent to the soldiers that worked for Hitler trying to justify their participation. Guilty - Shame on all of you who have perpetrated this. I am glad I am a Christian, I am glad I was even made aware of the Lord...I have been so blessed and continue to be blessed regardless of this affliction. The vehicle may have been wrecked but the driver is still alive and well for eternity....thanks be to God. I am in good company. I pray that the Lord touches the hearts of these elitists so they will become Pauls instead of Sauls. That's about all I can do these days. Oh, possibly see a chelation therapist with some magnets and nanomesh.....
Mm
Atrocity ** From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - it must be valid rather than true ~ is a term used to describe crimes or excesses ranging from an act committed against a single person to one committed against a population or ethnic group.
In general use, an atrocity or massacre designates a politically or ethnically motivated killing of civilians. In international law, more precise terms are war crime and crime against humanity.
An atrocity can be a single specific event or a series of events or can refer to genocide. The defining characteristic of an atrocity is its brutal or systematic nature. It is an act of killing that is in violation of most traditional moral principles, although some societies do not condemn such behavior. Often, hostilities exceed the legitimate mandate of killing enemy combatants to include attacks upon unarmed people, upon combatants after their surrender, or upon otherwise non-combative peoples. Thus, nearly every culture has in its history acts of killing which are atrocities.
The historical record is clouded by a failure to determine if mutilated bodies represent torture before death or mutilation of a dead body. In either case, the important effect is the propaganda value, and its effect on the morale of the enemy.
Sometimes mass killing is imposed on civilian populations of no military significance, simply as a warning. For example, Dresden or Hiroshima. In other cases, they are targeted at military sub-groups, such as African-American summary execution in the field by the Confederate Army during the American Civil War. Small-scale atrocities may represent anything from disrespect, regional propaganda or both.
See, the benefits outweigh the risks in their defective thinking.
|
|
|
Post by nanofairlady on Sept 26, 2007 8:17:58 GMT -5
Mag,,Your very poor view of the nations,religions made me think you have been treated as the president of Columbia university. But as a doctor I ignore your insults because you are a sick person.. And as a human being I ignore your insults because you are a spirit of my God.. I hope you can get your cure and your wounds become healed sooner than my brothers and sisters' wounds of your troops bombing in Iraq and Afganistan.. I hope you become happy sooner than my people who are still suffering from chemical attacks of Sadam with your Gov support during 8 years. I hope you understand loving the others is so easily that you dont need to get money,fame,and other cheap things you mentioned. Love is easy and great..if you try to make your mind broader than your American borders,then you can understand why I tried to help. God bless you and yours
|
|
|
Post by nanofairlady on Sept 27, 2007 4:54:24 GMT -5
Thanks Whiterose healthcare.zdnet.com/?p=297this link shows how possible my comment is to open a cure way.. As somebodies are doing this procedure for evaluation of HIV in it's window period here.. I dont mind how much somebodies evaluate my IQ,,you cant satisfy all people during your lifetime,,but God has given us a tongue to pray for us all,,not to pull down the creatures of God. I think this is a general forum,,and you can share the others with your POLITE comments.
|
|
|
Post by nanofairlady on Sept 27, 2007 5:02:12 GMT -5
Thanks ruth to let me post your PM on board nanofairlady, i first posted on forum, then deleted the religion force is strong in this country. God of Peace, huh?
in my mind, the people who supported and got bush in office....(+electoral vote manipulations) are 'the christians' programmed to protect israel as Gods' chosen land.
i cannot imagine waking everyday (ONE day) to life in the middle east. when people (everywhere) just want to live a daily life in safety and security the lowest level of humanity being met.
the programming of being at war with "terrorists" a lot of americans are waking up. the internet is awesome. you can't deny implosions happening at "9.11 terrorist attack video's.
i think richardson, the gov of new mexico, says he will do immediate withdrawal of all troups. we absolutely need a minority for president. these white boys in charge, decide your fate in an office with toy soldiers. i am white, but 'a horse of a different color'.
gov richardon or hilary should make it to the white house. now, you all just have to survive till 2009? i haven't heard your president at columbia, yet. (he is brave, a lot of erratic people out there) i'm hoping bush will get impeached (right away) for illegally starting this war in iraq. what a mess!
you said this (morgellons) is not prevelant in your country? i am very surprised at this. how or when did you encounter morgellons? were you in practice as a medical professional in iran? why are you not welcomed in this U.S research group? are there unwritten clauses or guidelines associated with the funding of this group?
we are a melting pot of nationalities and cultures. the immigration issue is always 'in your face' when the president is diverting attention from some of the brazen crap he does. many of the hispanics from texas to california fight to live on ancestral ground, but NO, we took that land from them and now won't let them legally live there. the president is building a fence, probably using undocumented labor. haha
what a waste of resources. who cares? we are owned by the federal reserve which is privately owned. talk about a conflict of interest!
peace and light, ruth
I am a subspecial in cardiology,,active here. Dr Wymore,Cliff Mickleson,,and Karen Marsh tried to pull me in the research team on August I was in USA for a scientific course,but OSU has its own limitation to let nonmembers work there,,and it is completely understandable. I am thankful of them with their very broad mind. I have involved your case by my American friends.
Thanks for your beautiful compassion with our people. Bless you
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Sept 27, 2007 14:45:42 GMT -5
Life - but not as we know it 06 June 2007 Douglas Fox Magazine issue 2607 "AMMONIA! Ammonia!" gasps the alien as it crawls through the desert. The scene comes from a cartoon penned by Robert Grossman in The New Yorker in 1962 - the joke being that perhaps water isn't the only life-giving liquid in the universe. Of course, any high-school biology teacher will tell you this idea is pure fantasy. All known living things, from lowly bacteria to humans, rely on two basic chemical ingredients: carbon and water. Carbon, often referred to as the backbone of life, has the rare ability to glue essential elements together to form complex molecules apparently vital for life. And the medium in which all these complex molecules float about, and in which the basic chemical reactions of life occur, is water. No other liquid has been observed to do the same job. Probes sent to Mars and Venus have reinforced this by discovering barren, waterless environments conspicuously devoid ... tinyurl.com/yw8r2rA trans-Neptunian object (TNO) is any object in the solar system that orbits the sun at a greater distance on average than Neptune. The Kuiper belt, Scattered disk, and Oort cloud are names for three divisions of this volume of space. tinyurl.com/23bpdbskytroll
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Sept 27, 2007 14:48:59 GMT -5
Templars used to cut off heads, what did they use them for?
Whiterose asked this question, and I think the skulls that were found, but what was it that was left of the Falcon? and was out to sea? resin holds it in there.
Is this what Venter was looking for?
Maybe even Darwin was looking for it.
Skytroll
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Sept 27, 2007 14:51:47 GMT -5
Have to hand it to these folks, they sure know how to play a dangerous chess game, however I understand the computer beat the best chess player we have? So, Kurzweil might be onto something there.
Riddles are fun aren't they?
Darn puzzle sure isn't, though, but at some point the picture will be very clear.
skytroll
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Sept 27, 2007 14:54:23 GMT -5
When the people win, then everyone wins. No more buff a lo ing anyone.
"God rest ye merry gentlemen......" and they brought forth ..............for the star shone in the East"............
skytroll
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Sept 27, 2007 14:59:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Sept 27, 2007 15:02:51 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Sept 27, 2007 15:05:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Sept 27, 2007 15:08:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Sept 27, 2007 15:13:08 GMT -5
"I n t r o d u c t i o n Two predictions are cited particularly often whenever one talks or writes about the history or future of computing. One of these is more and more wrong, and the other is less and less right, and they both teach us how to use theoretical opportunities to find new technologies. The first prediction, a beloved opening of speeches and papers, was made by the head of the electromagnetic relay calculator at Harvard, Howard Aiken, in 1956: "If it should turn out that the basic logics of a machine designed for the numerical solution of differential equations coincide with the logics of a machine intended to make bills for a department store, I would regard this as the most amazing coincidence that I have ever encountered" [Anonymous, 1997] The amazing "coincidence" did happen and happens more and more every day, tempting us to consider it a part of the history of computers that took its own unexpected course ("Only six electronic digital computers would be required to satisfy the computing needs of the entire United States," Howard Aiken said in 1947): a program and a machine, software and hardware, were interwoven at the beginning and then became more and more separated. At least it seems so when we look at the development of computer designs since Charles Babbage's 1840s Analytical Engine. A program on punched cards or tapes and a machine for which the specific cards were made look inseparable, in contrast to today's programs which we move throughout the World Wide Web and compile and execute on virtually any computer. Yet Alan Mathison Turing (and also Alonzo Church, Stephen Cole Kleene, and Emil Post independently at the same time) had already proved in 1936 that the only possible course the history could have taken was the one it in fact took. Turing used what we now also cite often and call a Turing machine to prove that only the simplest calculus, such as a propositional algebra with a Boolean evaluation (true, false) and its main model a 0-1 Boolean algebra, is computable, i.e., effectively calculable [Turing 1936; Turing, 1937]. He (and others) also proved that real numbers are not computable, that there exists no algorithm with the help of which we can decide for every arithmetical sentence in finitely many steps whether it is true or false, etc. In other words, from the very start we only had Boolean algebra at our disposal, and once hardware was developed that could handle classical logic operations - such implementations of logic operations are called logic gates - the universal classical computer was born. The "only" thing one had to develop were "digital" algorithms and programs for all possible applications, i.e., the software for a universal computer. Everything - solving nonlinear differential equations, 3D modeling, speech recognition, and "making bills for a department store" - had to be reduced to a Boolean language. Since such a reduction imposes ever-growing speed and memory requirements upon the hardware, until mid-2002 we were witnessed quite the opposite situation than half a century ago: the software lagged behind the hardware, following the Wirth's law: "Software gets slower faster than hardware gets faster." Will this computing history repeat itself with quantum computers? Will quantum hardware start to advance faster than quantum software (quantum algorithms) in the near future? In this book we shall try to learn how close we are to answering these questions. The second prediction is known as Moore's Law, or better yet, Moore's laws, since there are many versions and varieties of the several formulations made by Gordon Moore of the Intel Corporation. One widespread rendering of the law, "The number of transistors on a single integrated-circuit chip doubles every 18 months" [Birnbaum and Williams, 2000], does not correspond to the historical data which show 26 months [Brenner, 2001]. Moore himself commented. "I never said 18 months. I said one year [in 1965], and then two years [in 1975]. One of my Intel colleagues changed it from the complexity of the chips to the performance of computers and decided that not only did you get a benefit from the doubling every two years but we were able to increase the clock frequency, too, so computer performance was actually doubling every 18 months. I guess that's a corollary of Moore's Law. Moore's Law has been the name given to everything that changes exponentially in the industry... If Al Gore invented the Internet, I invented the exponential" [Yang, 2000] And this "exponential" element is what is essential for our development and what quantum computers are about. Apparently everything underlying the development of technology and society grows exponentially: research, information, production and organization complexity, and above all, the costs of keeping pace. So only an exponential increase of our computational and processing power and an exponential decrease of computer cost per processed bit could support such a development. Therefore, Moore's law was been kept as a guideline in the computer industry in past three decades and it has supported a global development during this period. Gates in today's computers are switched on and off by about 1000 electrons. In 2010, the exponential Moore's Law would require that only about 10 electrons do the job. Miniaturization cannot go much further than that. It is true that many other possible roads could still keep up the pace for a few more years: insulating layers can be reduced in their thickness from the present 25 atoms to 4 or 5 atoms (wires connecting transistors in a chip already occupy more than 25% of its space); computing power can be increased by designing processors so as to contain execution units that process multiple instructions within one cycle; processors can rely on parallel compiling technology and use innovative software; and finally, chips can eventually get bigger by using reversible gates to avoid overheating. Still, by 2020 or 2025 computing technology will hit the quantum barrier, and if we want to support the growth of our technology and science beyond that point in time, we need to find a substitute for exponentially rising classical computational power by then. Actually, the exponential increase of the clock speed of processors (CPUs) already became linear in 2002 (see Fig. 3.1, p. 135), and an extensive patching activity onto classical hardware and software is currently under way in order to compensate for this lack of an exponential increase in speed (see p. 136). Now that both Wirth's and Moore's laws are coming to an end, we should draw a moral from them. Wirth's law taught us that classical hardware development has prompted ever new software, and Moore's law taught us that this hardware development has followed an exponential trend of speed, memory, and lately of number of processors (multiple cores, multiple processors, clusters). Such an approach to computation will apparently change completely in the quantum realm. Quantum hardware is exponential in itself, and if we eventually succeed in making functional scalable quantum computers, we will dispense with the need for a steadily growing quantum hardware development - to make a quantum computer faster means to scale it up linearly or polynomially. We will also dispense with writing ever new software for faster and faster hardware. Once developed, quantum software (quantum algorithms) will simply scale up as we scale - and therefore speed up - quantum hardware. "........... m3k.grad.hr/pavicic/book/skytroll
|
|