|
Post by whiterose on Jul 8, 2007 18:02:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by booniesboy on Jul 8, 2007 19:24:23 GMT -5
In that article (it comes as no surprise 'UK denies widespread evidence') there is a delightful reference link to 'Brian' at holmestead.ca/chemtrails/spreading.html The Canadian response, despite the Espanola, Ontario experience, is to deny what most people know are not normal contrails from a jet. Our own experience is that these jets perform rather incredible flight dynamics (crisscrossing at right angles and sharp climb rates -- the classic 'X' chemtrail formation). These activities would 'unreasonable' for a normal commercial jet to perform. Certainly the passengers would complain, not to mention their bosses. Denial usually points to a guilty act - question is, what are they trying to cover-up, and who are in bed together? Thanks for the link! Blessings, booniesboy
|
|
david
New Member
Posts: 32
|
Post by david on Jul 10, 2007 19:34:37 GMT -5
That's Andrew's paper which contains the PROOF we found of UK chemtrailing activity via satellite imaging. See: chemtrailsuk.netdavID ==
|
|