|
Post by Admin on May 9, 2009 10:46:35 GMT -5
This was moved as it was not posted in the correct area:
CR - I am just throwing this out there because it is an area that I find very disturbing, and would like to hear other people's opinions. Why haven't any other researchers attempted to replicate Carnicom's contentions? I mean, using his wine/peroxide method, extract materials from a good number of people who do not identify themselves as having Morgellons, and a few that do, and compare the findings? Also, I don't see that whatever it is that was pulled was ever examined with highly sophisticated equipment to determine for sure just what it is that he is finding? I know that you can't just look at something under magnification and determine for sure what you are looking at. Also, if this "network" is found within the skin of everyone, why aren't doctors finding this accidently? I've had punch biopsies done for Morphea diagnosis, but there was never any mention of anything odd showing up. Somehow it just doesn't add up. I am not saying he is wrong - I don't know that - but I have a hard time believing it if someone else doesn't find the same thing (and determine for sure what the materials are that are found). I only want to know the truth, whatever it is. Are there any scientists out there willing to take the bait and prove or disprove this work??? sunnydaze
|
|
|
Post by crystalriver on May 9, 2009 18:45:29 GMT -5
Hi Sunnydaze, It is difficult to say why someone else hasn't done something--I have no idea. I do know Mr. Cliff Carnicom has done exceptional work ---his site speaks volumes: www.carnicom.com/conright.htmThe good folks seem to be at a disadvantage--money wise; but many still are fighting the good fight and it shouldn't be with each other, IMO. Many these days are trained not to look--I suspect that is at more than just Morgellons lesions. I'm not a doctor perhaps you can ask one. Many I'm sure are standing back; it's a dangerous field-- I'm sure not going to be the one to rip on folks who are spending their lives attempting to bring the information into awareness. Many do it at the cost of relationships--why? Because we know how important it is--it is not for glory or money or fame but to stop this madness because some of us see the writing on the wall. I can't say why only some of us understand it--perhaps it has been an enormous amount of research that has brought us to a strange and dark understanding of what is being attempted. I attack no researcher--those that are not in it for the right reasons will be known--I don't have to play judge and that would be a terrible place to be if your wrong on something as globally important as this subject. Many Blessings, CrystalRiver
|
|
|
Post by sunnydaze on May 10, 2009 11:48:35 GMT -5
CR - I am sorry that my questions were seen as ripping on anyone. I have said repeatedly that I support all the research efforts by anyone with the background to do so. I think all the pieces of this huge jigsaw will intersect one day. I just don't understand why there isn't more effort to communicate among themselves and try to integrate their findings. Are asking questions always an effort to discredit? Not on my part. They are an effort to comprehend. The only ones I have no patience for are the crooks who claim to have cures at exhorbitant prices - and they are not researchers/scientists. Sunnydaze
|
|
|
Post by crystalriver on May 12, 2009 10:01:36 GMT -5
Hi Sunnydaze,
We all have questions. Ever hear the statement --you catch more flies with honey than with vinegar? This take on things will also not hurt those that are working so hard. You have to figure; there are dark influences that these folks fight almost daily.
Good questions are important--in your first statement you said something about taking the bait. That sounded a bit threatening more than discovery--I would run from that if I were a researcher.
It wouldn't matter if there weren't so many others and it was only you ---your words affect--but there are.
Many Blessings, CrystalRiver
|
|