|
Post by skytroll on Jun 22, 2007 23:06:32 GMT -5
Ted getting nervous about their Genome and Nano lack of funding soon? If we stop it? Hope so. Have you seen these videos posted by Browncircles on LB? www.ted.com/index.php/talks/view/id/80www.ted.com/index.php/talks/view/id/38Then, keep in mind this, they are part of this movement> Drexler and Feynman: WARNING Physical reality, as we know it now, has little meaning once nano-machines take over. Objects in space-time can have no essential nature if composed of multi-programmable-replicating- universal-information-bearing-Turing-machines! Reality will probably collapse like a 'house of cards' with lot of nightmares on the way down. The funny thing IS, though, I think IT'S always BEEN that way. "Nanotechnology is the blanket term used to describe the precision manufacture of materials and structures of molecular dimensions. Many of the goals of nanotechnology were expressed nearly 40 years ago by th renowned physicist Richard P. Feynman. Molecular-scale robots currently exist only in the imaginations of nanotechnologists and the artists who depict their ideas. But some technological visionaries, led by K. Eric Drexler, think that the dream will soon become a reality that will transform everything from health care to food production. (Drexler's ideas are outlined in his book Engines of Creation)." Scientific American on nantechnology home.earthlink.net/~eldonenew/nano.htmskytroll
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jun 22, 2007 23:12:29 GMT -5
Treatment for Nano bacteria? www.earthclinic.com/CURES/nano-bacteria.htmland "First Live Video of Calcifying Nanoparticles Provides Possible Key to Chronic Disease Condition - New Study Reveals Distinction Between Calcifying Nanoparticles and Inorganic Crystals TAMPA, FL (Nov. 2, 2006) – Scientists today released the first live video footage of calcifying nanoparticles, or CNPs, that might play a basic role in calcifying diseases ranging from heart disease to prostate disease and kidney stones. Calcification is a harmful condition found in most diseases on the leading-cause-of-death list, including cardiovascular disease—the nation’s single leading cause of death. Even the lesser problem of kidney stones results in more than one million doctor visits and 250,000 hospitalizations every year. "We used a new, high-definition Nikon microscope system, validated with a new award-winning system from Aetos Technologies, which allowed real-time tracking of calcifying nanoparticles (CNPs) at a size of around 100 nanometers," explained Dr. Neva Ciftcioglu, Science Director of Nanobac Pharmaceuticals, which produced the video. "Before these technologies were created recently, we had to chemically treat the nanoparticles to see below the 200 nanometer threshold, which kept us from observing live processes." This video, for the first time, illustrates: 1) A decalcifying agent dissolving calcified structures while the particles inside seem unaffected and are released to potentially begin the calcification process again. 2) By contrast, inorganic crystals exposed to the same agent are dissolved without releasing nanoparticles. [more...] more at this link: www.nanobaclabs.com/Skytroll
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jun 22, 2007 23:27:20 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jun 23, 2007 0:50:46 GMT -5
Nanobacteria:Alternative View on the Putative Organism, Nanobacterium sanguineum "From the present study it is concluded by the author that the putative organism Nanobacterium sanguineum does not represent a free-living biological entity but is, instead, a microcrystalline form of hydroxyapatite complexed with exogeneous biological macromolecules, including DNA and protein The first problem which I identified was the very small size of the organism. Its size is only about 1/100th to 1/1000th the size of conventional bacteria at 20nm [3]. It is worth noting that this happens also to be the standard size of commercially produced hydroxyapatite nanocrystals[4]. In looking at survival strategies of bacteria in the natural environment, Roszak and Cowell[5] concluded that ultramicrobacteria (e.g. Spirillum, Leucothrix, Flavobacterium, Cytophaga and Vibrio spp) are representative of the autochthonous bacterial communities in the marine and estuarine environment. What is important to note is that these ultramicrobacteria are still of the order of 200-300nm. At a recent Workshop it was suggested that the theoretical minimum size for a free-living organism (capable of holding the minimal molecular complement of ~250-450 proteins, genes and ribosomes would be 250-300 nm in diameter, a figure which matches well that described for the ultramicrobacteria. Indeed, even a single ribosome, if surrounded by membrane and wall, would occupy a sphere of 57 nm in diameter[6]. The latter study was further supported by the study of the gene complement of Mycoplasma genitalium[7] (with just a 0.58 megabase genome this has been proclaimed the minimal gene complement). Through comparison with the gene set for Haemophilus influenzae[8] (both represent ancient bacterial lineages with one being Gram-positive and the other Gram-negative it was possible to identify 256 genes which the authors felt represented the minimal gene set necessary and sufficient to sustain translation, replication, recombination and repair, transcription, chaperone functions, nucleotide metabolism, amino acid metabolism, lipid metabolism, energy roles, coenzyme metabolism and utilisation, polysaccharides, uptake of inorganic ions, secretion, receptors and other conserved functions. Observations on Archaea indicate that, in general, they have size limits similar to those for conventional bacteria. In an interesting theoretical paper by Moore[9] he argues that to “design” a cell of the order of 60nm then we would have to invoke a supporting biochemistry unlike any known in modern cellular life and that a cell even smaller would require even more radical departures, which he lacks the imagination to consider, a view which is shared by many of the other contributors to this Workshop. It is concluded from such work that the much smaller bodies (~50nm) called Nanobacteria may not, themselves, be viable living organisms It has been stated that Nanobacterium are unique in that they can develop a calcium apatite cell wall, forming an enclosure around the organism[10]. Considering the size of the hydroxyapatite ‘wall’ it is even more difficult to see how a living organism can be within such a small structure. Whilst it may be possible to hypothesise a minimal cell size of a 50nm sphere for a living, replicating single biopolymer system (i.e. one in which the nucleic acid is both catalytic and genetic), a two biopolymer system (i.e. one with nucleic acid together with proteins/enzymes) would have to be 5-10 times the volume. Clearly, on this basis, Nanobacterium sanguineum could not reasonably represent a living, replicating organism, a view also shared by Ferris[11] and others[12],[13],[14].:Now, if this is not a living organism is it a programmable, magnetic/electrical, synthetic organism? further on in the paper.............."Interestingly, an earlier study by Ruzicka[15] in 1983 identified what he believed to be a very small bacteria isolated from peripheral blood which he called Basoplasma sanguineum. These very small organisms had a mean diameter of 0.25µm, some of which he purported to have a cell wall whilst others were cell wall deficient. He now believes that his organism and the putative Nanobacterium are one and the same. Late in the review process two key published documents were identified which also cast very serious doubts on the interpretation that these microcrystalline bodies are indeed living organisms. Thus, Cisar et al [16]published a critical paper in October 2000 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in which they dispute the earlier findings of Kajander and Ciftcioglu[17]. One of the key scientific findings from this study was that the 16S rDNA sequences previously ascribed to Nanobacterium sanguineum were found to be indistinguishable from those of an environmental microorganism, Phyllobacterium mysinascearum. More recently, Cranton[18] published an Internet article in which he demonstrated that the alleged Nanobacteria do not cause calcification of arterial plaque. This leads to the obvious conclusion that the particles identified as the living organism Nanobacterium sanguineum are in fact non-living but self-generating inorganic particles of hydroxyapatite which have been complexed with nucleic acids, proteins and other ionic biomolecules. It has been demonstrated that organic materials have key roles as nucleating surfaces, so triggering crystal growth in the biomineralisation of apatite, in addition to modulating and finally inhibiting the process[19]. In this context it is worth noting that crystal growth is enhanced in low gravitational environments and this may help to explain why astronauts returning to earth are prone to calcific atherosclerosis."..........................................: See the table and compare, this I think is important, because if one is living and multiplying, that is one thing, but, if nanobacterium is not living and multplying, then that definetly is a different situation. Key “evidence” relating to the biological status of Nanobacterium sanguineum Key points to be noted: 1 Nanobacteria are cytotoxic to fibroblasts and kidney cells in vitro. www.nanobaclabs.com/events/events.asp 2 16S rRNA gene sequence results showed the bacterium to be in the alpha-2 subgroup of Proteobacteria. www.nanobaclabs.com/events/events.asp 3 Nanobacteria are novel apatite mineral-forming agents found in human and animal blood and tissues, and arouse an antibody response. www.nanobaclabs.com/events/events.asp 4 Nanoisolates were excreted into urine more effectively than control substances (hydroxyapatite and commercial nanocolloid). www.nanobaclabs.com/events/events.asp 5 Nanobacterium sanguineum cannot be killed by Penicillin, cephalosporins, macrolides and most other antibiotics. www.nanobaclabs.com/nanobaclabs-nanobacteria-what-are-nanobacteria.asp 6 Nanobacteria are extremophiles and have been found to be the most resistant of all bacterial SuperBugs to destruction. www.nanobaclabs.com/nanobaclabs-nanobacteria-what-are-nanobacteria.asp7 Some controversy remains surrounding the characteristics and pathogenicity of this ultra-small and difficult to detect bacterium. home.swipnet.se/isop/biofilms.htm 8 Its uniform layers of calcification, called a biofilm, with which it encapsulates and protects itself. home.swipnet.se/isop/biofilms.htm 9 It has recently been shown to give a false positive test for Chlamydia. home.swipnet.se/isop/biofilms.htm 10 It requires culturing on living cell cultures and not on artificial media agar like common bacteria. home.swipnet.se/isop/biofilms.htm11 The Nanobac treatment regimen involves rectal suppositories of EDTA, oral enzymes, vitamins that augment EDTA and a nightly dosage of tetracycline. home.swipnet.se/isop/biofilms.htm 12 Several scanning electron micrographs of Nanobacterium and clusters. www.lifescore.com/nanoscore.htm13 Calcific atherosclerosis is a result of infection with Nanobacterium. www.heartfixer.com/indexNB.htm 14 Properties of microcrystalline hydroxyapatite. www.villaparkpharmacy.com/abs04.htm 15 Leading manufacturers of microcrystalline hydroxyapatite complex. www.indiamart.com/clarion/ 16 Supplier of microcrystalline hydroxyapatite complex in Ohio, USA. store.yahoo.com/vitanet/calmichyd180.html17 Detection of hydroxyapatite using FT-Raman spectroscopy. www.s-a-s.org/journal/00/November2000_ea2.htm18 Direct synthesis of nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite with particle size ~ 100nm www.ul.ie/~cost523/poster1/Jaroslav.htm19 Protein binding to hydroxyapatite is through ionic interactions as well as adsorption effects. Acidic proteins bind to calcium ions whereas basic proteins bind to phosphate groups. www.chromatography.co.uk/techniqs/bio/bio_011.htm20 According to Ciftcioglu the nanobacterial DNA seems to have an aberrant structure. www.nanobaclabs.com/events/events.aspFrom this Linktinyurl.com/2menveMuch info on this nanobacterium, seems to be a controversy there!
Skytroll
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jun 23, 2007 8:27:08 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by whiterose on Jun 23, 2007 11:07:05 GMT -5
Skytroll's posts here are of great value, there are some things that morgellons has been mistaken for and if you read through these posts you will see where nanotechnology comes into play. These are excellent!
|
|
|
Post by whiterose on Jun 23, 2007 13:51:57 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by whiterose on Jun 27, 2007 11:45:40 GMT -5
I bring this whole post forward, because skytroll does such an excellent job of bringing so much together!
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jun 27, 2007 21:30:54 GMT -5
Oh my. Beyond Wiki is Nanopolis! Wow. a treasure trove of Intelligence resources for the future Nano Revolution! or should I say Evolution? www.nanopolis.net/Oh. and now we have moved beyond fluorescent tags to quantum which can be controlled by laser. Whoop de do! " Nano-sized fluorescent probes that can slip inside living cells and elucidate life’s most fundamental processes, or track the effectiveness of cancer-fighting drugs, are barely noticed by the cells they enter, according to a team of researchers led by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab). Frank Chen holds a bottle of quantum dots. Using a high-throughput gene expression test, the team determined that the probes, which are specially coated quantum dots, only affect 0.2 percent of the human genome. This finding should quell concerns that the mere presence of these promising but potentially toxic sentinels disrupts a cell’s function, confounding quantum dots’ ability to accurately track cellular processes or monitor the effectiveness of pharmaceuticals. “Because of their protective coating, we found that quantum dots pose minimal impact to cells,” says Fanqing Frank Chen, a scientist in Berkeley Lab’s Life Sciences Division who led the research team. “ The only gene changes we see are related to transporting the dots into and within cells.”In addition, the tool used by Chen and colleagues to analyze quantum dots — a gene chip packed with 18,400 probes of known human genes — is one of the world’s most comprehensive and streamlined ways to measure the toxicity of nano-scale particles. This is an especially important tool given that nanoparticles frequently make the news over concerns that they pose health risks. “Berkeley Lab is one of the first labs in the world to conduct and publish studies on high-throughput, whole-genome analyses of the toxicity of nanoparticles” says Chen. Chen’s team used this toxicogenomics tool to study quantum dots, which are crystalline semiconductors composed of a few hundred or thousand atoms that emit different colors of light when illuminated by a laser. Because these fluorescent probes are stable, they have the ability to remain in a cell’s cytoplasm and nucleus without fading out much longer than conventional fluorescent labels. This could give biologists a clear view of processes that span several hours or even days, such as DNA replication, genomic alterations, and cell cycle control. Their longevity has also made quantum dots a powerful molecular label, allowing scientists to study the earliest signs of cancer, track the effectiveness of pharmaceuticals that target the cellular underpinnings of disease, and understand the events that occur during stem cell differentiation. ".......... ........AND THAT PROTECTIVE COATING IS?............. "Several years ago, Paul Alivisatos, a Berkeley Lab chemist in the Materials Sciences Division and Associate Laboratory Director, developed a way to fashion especially stable quantum dots from cadmium selenide and zinc sulfide. One drawback to this approach, however, is that these quantum dots may release potentially toxic cadmium and zinc ions into cells. To solve this problem, Alivisatos and Daniele Gerion, a former postdoc in the Alivisatos lab, coated the dots with a protective layer of polyethylene glycol, which is a very nonreactive and stable compound that is used extensively by the pharmaceutical industry in drug formulation. This layer is designed to prevent the dots from leaking heavy metal ions into cells once they’re inside. “ The polyethylene glycose compound does not break down easily. At a very small scale, it is almost perfect in structure,” says Chen."[glow=red,2,300]polyethylene glycerol........doesn't break down...........[/glow]more here: "Their work is part of a new field called toxicogenomics. It’s based on the idea that if the environment inside a cell is altered by an external stimulus, then some of the cell’s genes will likely express themselves in an atypical way. The more toxic the external stimulus, the greater the number of genes that will be altered. Conversely, if the stimulus is benign, then very few genes will change. With this in mind, Chen’s team introduced polyethylene glycose-coated dots inside living cells, and ran the gene expression test. " link: www.thenanotechnologygroup.org/index.cfm?content=88&PressID=1491skytroll
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jul 2, 2007 1:24:42 GMT -5
Connecting buckyballs and DNA. Buckyballs are used in Chemtrails. "Buckyballs, are spherical, soccer-ball-shaped molecules containing 60 carbon atoms. The buckyballs used in the study were part of an innovative molecule called Bucky amino acid, or Baa, that was created in the lab of Rice chemist Andrew Barron. Baa is a marriage of buckyballs and phenylalanine, one of the 20 essential amino acids that are the building blocks of all proteins. "The findings were a bit surprising because the Bucky amino acids tend to form spherical clusters that are up to 12 times larger in diameter than the known width of intercellular gaps in the skin," said Barron, the Charles W. Duncan Jr.-Welch Professor of Chemistry, professor of materials science and associate dean for industry interactions and technology transfer. "It's not clear why flexing increases the uptake of fullerene peptides, but it will be important to further investigate these mechanisms as we study the medical potential of Bucky amino acids." BAA great for SHEEP right. We are moving in! tinyurl.com/3b6ngfSkytroll_
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jul 2, 2007 1:31:06 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jul 2, 2007 2:00:27 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jul 3, 2007 3:23:37 GMT -5
Well, now, wonder how this will work: "Sensory mechanotransduction can be extremely rapid. Mechanical stimulation of hair cells (receptor cells responsible for our sense of hearing) opens ion channels within 100 µs. Recent investigations show that ion channels of the DEG/ENaC-superfamily (Degenerin/Epithelial Na+ Channel) mediate sensory mechanotransduction by touch receptor neurons in the nematode C. elegans and activate within 500 ms of force application. We plan to characterize the mechanosensitivity of these channels in heterologous cells (CHO cells) using a functionalized, piezoresistive force sensor. Initial experiments will establish a quantitative relationship between applied force and membrane deformation in both untransfected, control cells and in cells co-expressing subunits of the MEC-4 channel complex (MEC-4, MEC-10, MEC-2, and MEC-6). A bio-mechanical model will be developed to describe the mechanical behavior of the CHO cells in the presence and absence of the MEC-4 channel complex. Additionally, we predict that force will open MEC-4 complex channels; the resulting ion flux can be measured directly using whole-cell patch clamp recording or indirectly using a fluorescent Ca2+ indicator. A model will be developed to describe the mechanosensitivity of single ion channel under loading, as well as the interaction of ion channels with other cell components such as cytoplasm, cytoskeleton and the actin cortex. Look at how this is put in the C. elegans: "Background and work plan Recent investigations showed that constitutively active MEC-4 channel complex form voltage independent, amiloride-sensitive Na+ channels when co-expressed in Xenopus oocytes. O¡¯Hagan et al used whole-cell patch clamp recording from identified C. elegans neurons in vivo and directly measured touch-evoked changes in membrane potential and membrane current. The data support the hypothesis that the MEC-4 channel complex is directly activated by mechanical stimulation and that activation of these channels is the first event step in the transduction of mechanical energy by C. elegans touch neurons." Note the picture of the "(CHO) cell"..........microsystems.stanford.edu/~ynzhao/Skytroll
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jul 3, 2007 3:32:09 GMT -5
MECHANOTRANSDUCTION: "Mechanotransduction, which is the process of converting a mechanical stimulus into a cellular response, plays a critical role in many physiological processes, such as in hearing, touch, and bone repair to name a few. Cells may respond to these mechanical stimuli through cell surface receptors (e.g. integrin) that link the cytoskeleton to components of the extracellular matrix or to other cells. In turn, these signals lead to the activation of intracellular signaling pathways, which can result in the upregulation/downregulation of particular genes, creating an altered cellular response. see it in pictures: socrates.berkeley.edu/~cte/research/mechanotransduction.htm..... "We study the effects of different chemical stimuli, mechanical stimuli and extracellular matrices on adult human stem cells and mouse embryonic stem cells. Each of these stimuli may cause the cells to differentiate into different types of cells such as vascular cells, cardiac cells and neuronal cells. For instance, using the techniques of micropatterning matrix, peptide engineering, polymer engineering, and 3D cell cultures, we aspire to achieve stem cell differentiation into a desired cell phenotype. In addition to determining the cell type of the differentiated stem cell and what stimuli causes the change, we try to elucidate the pathway and mechanism from stem cell to differentiated cell." socrates.berkeley.edu/~cte/research/stemcells.htmSkytroll
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jul 4, 2007 8:21:38 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jul 4, 2007 10:15:18 GMT -5
Here is our dilemma folks! The nano machines can be made from biological systems OR They can be made from scratch. Note this, carefully, two ways to make nano machines work. "Small machines will eventually be made, but the strategy used to make them, and the purposes they will serve, remain to be devised. Biology provides one brilliantly developed set of examples: in living systems, nanomachines do exist, and they do perform extraordinarily sophisticated functions. What is striking is how different the strategies used in these nanometer-scale machines are from those used in human-scale machines. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- It will be a marvelous challenge to see if we can outdesign evolution. It would be a staggering accomplishment to mimic the simplest living cell. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In thinking about how best to make nanomachines, we come up against two limiting strategies. The first is to take existing nanomachines--those present in the cell--and learn from them. We will undoubtedly be able to extract from these systems concepts and principles that will enable us to make variants of them that will serve our purposes, and others that will have entirely new functions. Genetic engineering is already proceeding down this path, and the development of new types of chemistry may enable us to use biological principles in molecular systems that are not proteins and nucleic acids. The second is to start from scratch and independently to develop fundamental new types of nanosystems. Biology has produced one practical means for fabrication and synthesis of functional nanomachines, and there is no reason to believe that there cannot be others. But this path will be arduous. Looking at the machines that surround us and expecting to be able to build nanoscale versions of them using processes analogous to those employed on a large scale will usually not be practical and in many cases impossible. Machining and welding do not have counterparts at nanometer sizes. Nor do processes such as moving in a straight line through a fluid or generating magnetic fields with electromagnets. Techniques devised to manufacture electronic devices will certainly be able to make some simple types of mechanical nanodevices, but they will be limited in what they can do." www.mtmi.vu.lt/pfk/funkc_dariniai/nanostructures/nano_robots.htmwhip-like tails on E-COLI, used in Agro, Bioremediation, experimentation. E-coli the way in~ Flagella? the folding in? by way of prion or protein, the circuitry in the amyloid prion, sup 35? E-coli is in the waters, it is rising. Watched C-span congress hearing EPA and GEO who said that 9 objectives were to be addreassed by EPA, one of the two that was to be done was HUMAN PATHOGENS. 2003 and 2005, monies paid to EPA and they did not do it. These should have been first on the list, but, all the global warming BS got in the way. Beaches not posting when e-coli present, days later, wrong signs etc. A good look at e-coli and replication as biological nano engines and the constructed from scratch nano engines are Morgellons, IMO! These are machines, and you kill one of those they replicate. either way. So what we see as natural, probably is, surely microscopes can pick up e-coli, even in modified forms, after all we have the GENOME and e-coli is the GREAtEST MODEL. How much has e-coli been modified? is in all the waters....... EPA has ignored, said will take up to 18 more months to get the dangers signs up, to warn people of swimming in e-coli infested waters. Tests are taken in many states inconsistent with the protocol, seems every state creates own protocol, EPA does not pursue, more concerned about pollution, global warming, then the outcome, not even testing correctly and they have the resources. Seems like they had a plan from the beginning! Okay, back to me swamp! OGRES! They know, at least an outhouse keeps the e-coli in one spot and can be buried and become part of the soil, that is not e-coli, but, playing with it in plants, and animals and water and humans and spraying it on the earth and using it for fuel, can surely spread it around. What a bunch of BS. skytroll Skytroll
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jul 4, 2007 11:10:51 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jul 4, 2007 13:06:17 GMT -5
nanoscopic peapods? "Buckyball-filled Nanotubes Image: Physical Review Letters Hollow nanotubes made of pure carbon possess remarkable strength and potentially unique electrical properties, making them an interesting starting material for new sorts of devices. To that end, researchers have investigated how the tiny tubes--measuring as little as one nanometer in diameter--can be filled with other compounds to tweak their behavior. In 1998 David Luzzi and colleagues at the University of Pennsylvania created "nanoscopic peapods," which were in essence nanotubes stuffed with chains of carbon spheres called buckyballs. Now Sumio Iijima of Meijo University and NEC Research Corporation, who discovered carbon nanotubes in 1991, Hisanori Shinohara of Nagoya University and colleagues have done the same thing using a different sort of pea. Instead of the standard buckyball sphere of 60 carbon atoms, C60, the Japanese scientists filled nanotubes with C82 buckyballs containing gadolinium atoms. Their work appears in the December 18th issue of Physical Review Letters. " www.mtmi.vu.lt/pfk/funkc_dariniai/nanostructures/nanotubes.htm#Nano-Knotsskytroll
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jul 5, 2007 1:02:51 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jul 8, 2007 3:13:25 GMT -5
Breaking it down: "Extensive libraries of nanoparticles, composed of an assortment of different sizes, shapes, and materials, and with various chemical and surface properties, have already been constructed. The field of nanotechnology is under constant and rapid growth and new additions continue to suppliment these libraries. The classes of nanoparticles listed below are all very general and multi-functional, however, some of their basic properties and current known uses in biotechnology, and particularly nanomedicine, are described here."........ .......................... ......................"Dendrimers Dendrimers are highly branched structures gaining wide use in nanomedicine because of the multiple molecular "hooks" on their surfaces that can be used to attach cell-identification tags, fluorescent dyes, enzymes and other molecules. The first dendritic molecules were produced around 1980, but interest in them has blossomed more recently as biotechnological uses are discovered. Nanomedical applications for dendrimers are many and include nanoscale catalysts and reaction vessels, micelle mimics, imaging agents and chemical sensors, and agents for delivering drugs or genes into cells. There are two basic structural types. One is the globular structure with a central core from which branches radiate. The second type has no central core and consists simply of a series of highly branched polymers." ............. "Nanorods Typically 1-100 nm in length, nanorods are most often made from semiconducting materials and used in nanomedicine as imaging and contrast agents. Nanorods can be made by generating small cylinders of silicon, gold or inorganic phosphate, among other materials." biotech.about.com/od/nanotechnology/a/typesnanopart.htmbiotech.about.com/od/bioethics/a/nanosafe.htmskytroll
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jul 8, 2007 3:57:38 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jul 10, 2007 2:02:23 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jul 10, 2007 2:04:07 GMT -5
You can't tell me that Venture is not in on the Global warming, He looks for things UNDER THE SEA, and to put this in synthetic bacteriophages!
silicatein needles, the poking things.
Let's see what Bacteriophage got out of the bag!
Skytroll
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jul 10, 2007 2:08:04 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jul 10, 2007 2:13:14 GMT -5
1975 "Highlight Milestones in the Biochemistry of Silicon: From Basic Research to Biotechnological Applications Reinhold Tacke * Institut für Anorganische Chemie der Universität, Am Hubland, D-97074 Würzburg (Germany), Fax: (+49) 931-888-4609 email: Reinhold Tacke (r.tacke@mail.uni-wuerzburg.de) *Correspondence to Reinhold Tacke, Institut für Anorganische Chemie der Universität, Am Hubland, D-97074 Würzburg (Germany), Fax: (+49) 931-888-4609 Keywords Bioinorganic chemistry; Enzyme catalysis; Proteins; Silica; Silicon Abstract 6.7 Gigatonnes of silicon are processed each year by marine organisms. Since it was known that silicon is an essential element for many biological systems, significant advances in the biochemistry of this element have been achieved from the classical viewpoint of silicon being a purely inorganic element. This article describes the proteins, genes, and molecular mechanisms of silicon metabolism in diatoms and sponges. These studies may help to reveal the role of silicon for optimal development and growth in many plants and animals as well as initiate the development of new technological methods for the shape-controlled production of new patterned silicone-based materials. " Wiley was in this HOOK, LINE, and SINKER! www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/66002121/ABSTRACT?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0Skytroll
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jul 10, 2007 3:52:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jul 22, 2007 1:55:22 GMT -5
well, we can zero in on who has the most gene patents: Deegan emphasized how complicated gene patenting is by showing the audience a list of the organizations with the most gene-related patents. First is the government, followed by the University of California, then genomics company Incyte (INCY), GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and biotech giant Genentech (DNA). The entire scope of gene-related industry is covered just in the top five: government, academia, genomics, big pharma and biotech. With so many cooks making the soup, the recipe can't be easy. "If anybody tells me right now they have the perfect solution to this, I think they're nuts," said David Galas, chief academic officer of the Keck Graduate Institute of Applied Life Sciences. From: New Quest: Mapping Gene Patents www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2001/03/42214Skytroll
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Jul 22, 2007 1:59:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Aug 16, 2007 16:43:01 GMT -5
Now this seems to be the direction and probably always has been, of the new evolution of computerized humans, to control and steal your thoughts. Now, this is criminal.......... Alfred Schoeller (by an e-mail message) told me about a paper by his friend Min Wang - Microtubule polarity and the direction of pigment transport reverse simultaneously in surgically severed melanophore arms (Cell. 1984 Jul;37(3):753-65) - reporting that "... They severed arms of erythrophores (special cells from certain fish) by microdisection and found that microtubules can form a new cell center in the severed arms (without a nucleus) ... This means that cells are some sort of holographic with an incredible cytoplasmic organization ...". "That is exactly what is implicit in the microtubule model of quantum consciousness. Not only can microtubule information patterns form thoughts, but they can also contain holographic information about how to organize new cell centers etc. In my view, the whole body (all of which has microtubules) can be involved in consciousness, not just the brain, although the brain has a neural organization structure that enables the thoughts to be expressed by muscles (vocal, gestures, writing, etc) whose activity is directed by the brain neural center, so that a naive first approximation is to consider the brain as the center of thought in the body. However, more nearly accurately in my view, consciousness is a whole-body holographic microtubule process. I am amazed that such an important result as the Min Wang paper has not attracted massive attention over the past 20 years." www.valdostamuseum.org/hamsmith/SidFarField.html#biologyNow, this Einstein business and Algebra and geometry seem to go hand in hand with the One world religion, unity. So, we best watch how close we come to believing it.......... Where did Newton go? Feynman who believes buckyballs and nano can create the desired math, the desired scaler time machine, and the human body as a computing device, then we can see where these scientists went with what is called the microtubule.
Alchemy, metagenomics, nano, origin of life, biophotons, photons, the buckyballs have electrical qualities...........
Replacing dendrytes with dendrimers and dimers.
Where religion and science cross, only Einstein's theory? Think there might be more. That is relativity, for every move there is a reaction, for every reaction, a move to another dimension? If the initial move is not done, then how can there be a reaction to create other reactions? What was the initial move? That is what we need to find. What is constant?
Just some questions, but, am aiming at the dimers......and the quantums.........
funny thing,,,,,,brings us back to this............www.quantumconsciousness.org/Skytroll
|
|
|
Post by skytroll on Aug 16, 2007 16:55:21 GMT -5
Microtubule and quantum dots...... Lets see how that works LIFE HEALTH AND DISEASE, A QUANTUM PERSPECTIVE... www.quantumconsciousness.org/quess who comes to the rescue and we shall call this symbiosis with Gaia?......... oneness with the earth, with the insects, the worms, the soil, .......Margulus........ Based on reason? or contrived math? or the music of the spheres?..........well then...... aH...........THE TREE OF THE KNOWLEDGE OF GOOD AND EVIL HAS TAKEN A BACKSEAT........ TO THE NEW TOL CREATED BY THOSE CREATING THE NEW HUMAN........AND WE SHALL CALL IT EVOLUTION......... Skytroll
|
|